Texas 2013 83rd Regular

Texas House Bill HB1318 Engrossed / Fiscal Note

Filed 02/01/2025

Download
.pdf .doc .html
                    LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD    Austin, Texas      FISCAL NOTE, 83RD LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION            May 14, 2013      TO: Honorable John Whitmire, Chair, Senate Committee on Criminal Justice      FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board     IN RE:HB1318 by Turner, Sylvester (Relating to the appointment of counsel to represent certain youths and indigent defendants.), As Engrossed    No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.  The bill would require the court, in certain circumstances, to appoint counsel within a reasonable time before the initial detention hearing is held to represent the child at that hearing.    The bill would disallow a public defender from accepting an appointment under Article 26.04(f) if the acceptance of the appointment would violate the maximum allowable caseloads established at the public defender's office. A chief public defender would be required to file with the court any reason for refusing the appointment, and the chief public defender may not be terminated, removed, or sanctioned for refusing in good faith to accept an appointment.    The Office of Court Administration (OCA) does not anticipate a significant fiscal impact to the state. No significant impact to juvenile correctional populations is expected from the bill. Local Government Impact According to the Texas Association of Counties, the counties of Brazoria, Kerr, and Rockwall reported that no significant fiscal impact is anticipated.    Source Agencies:212 Office of Court Administration, Texas Judicial Council, 644 Texas Juvenile Justice Department   LBB Staff:  UP, ESi, KKR, JPo    

LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE, 83RD LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
May 14, 2013





  TO: Honorable John Whitmire, Chair, Senate Committee on Criminal Justice      FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board     IN RE:HB1318 by Turner, Sylvester (Relating to the appointment of counsel to represent certain youths and indigent defendants.), As Engrossed  

TO: Honorable John Whitmire, Chair, Senate Committee on Criminal Justice
FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE: HB1318 by Turner, Sylvester (Relating to the appointment of counsel to represent certain youths and indigent defendants.), As Engrossed

 Honorable John Whitmire, Chair, Senate Committee on Criminal Justice 

 Honorable John Whitmire, Chair, Senate Committee on Criminal Justice 

 Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board

 Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board

HB1318 by Turner, Sylvester (Relating to the appointment of counsel to represent certain youths and indigent defendants.), As Engrossed

HB1318 by Turner, Sylvester (Relating to the appointment of counsel to represent certain youths and indigent defendants.), As Engrossed



No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.



The bill would require the court, in certain circumstances, to appoint counsel within a reasonable time before the initial detention hearing is held to represent the child at that hearing.    The bill would disallow a public defender from accepting an appointment under Article 26.04(f) if the acceptance of the appointment would violate the maximum allowable caseloads established at the public defender's office. A chief public defender would be required to file with the court any reason for refusing the appointment, and the chief public defender may not be terminated, removed, or sanctioned for refusing in good faith to accept an appointment.    The Office of Court Administration (OCA) does not anticipate a significant fiscal impact to the state. No significant impact to juvenile correctional populations is expected from the bill.

The bill would require the court, in certain circumstances, to appoint counsel within a reasonable time before the initial detention hearing is held to represent the child at that hearing. 

 

The bill would disallow a public defender from accepting an appointment under Article 26.04(f) if the acceptance of the appointment would violate the maximum allowable caseloads established at the public defender's office. A chief public defender would be required to file with the court any reason for refusing the appointment, and the chief public defender may not be terminated, removed, or sanctioned for refusing in good faith to accept an appointment. 

 

The Office of Court Administration (OCA) does not anticipate a significant fiscal impact to the state. No significant impact to juvenile correctional populations is expected from the bill.

Local Government Impact

According to the Texas Association of Counties, the counties of Brazoria, Kerr, and Rockwall reported that no significant fiscal impact is anticipated.

According to the Texas Association of Counties, the counties of Brazoria, Kerr, and Rockwall reported that no significant fiscal impact is anticipated.

Source Agencies: 212 Office of Court Administration, Texas Judicial Council, 644 Texas Juvenile Justice Department

212 Office of Court Administration, Texas Judicial Council, 644 Texas Juvenile Justice Department

LBB Staff: UP, ESi, KKR, JPo

 UP, ESi, KKR, JPo