LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD Austin, Texas FISCAL NOTE, 83RD LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION March 20, 2013 TO: Honorable Joe Deshotel, Chair, House Committee On Land & Resource Management FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE:HB1477 by Callegari (Relating to a court order to disannex an area from a municipality.), As Introduced No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated. The bill would amend the Local Government Code to authorize a petition to be filed against a municipality that has failed or refused to disannex an area within 60 days of receipt of a petition. A district court could order a municipality to disannex an area if the municipality has not met certain obligations as defined by the provisions of the bill. Local Government Impact There could be a significant fiscal impact to a municipality that failed to comply with disannexation in a timely manner; however, the cost would vary depending on the number of cases filed, the value of land that resulted in a loss of ad valorem and sales tax revenue; and whether a municipality had an extraterritorial jurisdiction to annex. According to the City of Cleburne, no fiscal impact is anticipated. Source Agencies: LBB Staff: UP, SZ, TP
LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE, 83RD LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
March 20, 2013
TO: Honorable Joe Deshotel, Chair, House Committee On Land & Resource Management FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE:HB1477 by Callegari (Relating to a court order to disannex an area from a municipality.), As Introduced
TO: Honorable Joe Deshotel, Chair, House Committee On Land & Resource Management
FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE: HB1477 by Callegari (Relating to a court order to disannex an area from a municipality.), As Introduced
Honorable Joe Deshotel, Chair, House Committee On Land & Resource Management
Honorable Joe Deshotel, Chair, House Committee On Land & Resource Management
Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board
Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board
HB1477 by Callegari (Relating to a court order to disannex an area from a municipality.), As Introduced
HB1477 by Callegari (Relating to a court order to disannex an area from a municipality.), As Introduced
No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.
No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.
The bill would amend the Local Government Code to authorize a petition to be filed against a municipality that has failed or refused to disannex an area within 60 days of receipt of a petition. A district court could order a municipality to disannex an area if the municipality has not met certain obligations as defined by the provisions of the bill.
Local Government Impact
There could be a significant fiscal impact to a municipality that failed to comply with disannexation in a timely manner; however, the cost would vary depending on the number of cases filed, the value of land that resulted in a loss of ad valorem and sales tax revenue; and whether a municipality had an extraterritorial jurisdiction to annex. According to the City of Cleburne, no fiscal impact is anticipated.
Source Agencies:
LBB Staff: UP, SZ, TP
UP, SZ, TP