LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD Austin, Texas FISCAL NOTE, 83RD LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION April 15, 2013 TO: Honorable Joe Deshotel, Chair, House Committee on Land & Resource Management FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE:HB1477 by Callegari (Relating to a court order to disannex an area from a municipality.), Committee Report 1st House, Substituted No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated. The bill would amend the Local Government Code to authorize a petition to be filed against a municipality that has failed or refused to disannex an area within 60 days of receipt of a petition. A district court could order a municipality to disannex an area if the municipality has not met certain obligations as defined by the provisions of the bill. Local Government Impact There could be a significant fiscal impact to a municipality that failed to comply with disannexation in a timely manner; however, the cost would vary depending on the number of cases filed, the value of land that resulted in a loss of ad valorem and sales tax revenue; and whether a municipality had an extraterritorial jurisdiction to annex. According to the City of Cleburne, no fiscal impact is anticipated. Source Agencies: LBB Staff: UP, SZ, TP
LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE, 83RD LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
April 15, 2013
TO: Honorable Joe Deshotel, Chair, House Committee on Land & Resource Management FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE:HB1477 by Callegari (Relating to a court order to disannex an area from a municipality.), Committee Report 1st House, Substituted
TO: Honorable Joe Deshotel, Chair, House Committee on Land & Resource Management
FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE: HB1477 by Callegari (Relating to a court order to disannex an area from a municipality.), Committee Report 1st House, Substituted
Honorable Joe Deshotel, Chair, House Committee on Land & Resource Management
Honorable Joe Deshotel, Chair, House Committee on Land & Resource Management
Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board
Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board
HB1477 by Callegari (Relating to a court order to disannex an area from a municipality.), Committee Report 1st House, Substituted
HB1477 by Callegari (Relating to a court order to disannex an area from a municipality.), Committee Report 1st House, Substituted
No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.
No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.
The bill would amend the Local Government Code to authorize a petition to be filed against a municipality that has failed or refused to disannex an area within 60 days of receipt of a petition. A district court could order a municipality to disannex an area if the municipality has not met certain obligations as defined by the provisions of the bill.
Local Government Impact
There could be a significant fiscal impact to a municipality that failed to comply with disannexation in a timely manner; however, the cost would vary depending on the number of cases filed, the value of land that resulted in a loss of ad valorem and sales tax revenue; and whether a municipality had an extraterritorial jurisdiction to annex. According to the City of Cleburne, no fiscal impact is anticipated.
Source Agencies:
LBB Staff: UP, SZ, TP
UP, SZ, TP