Texas 2013 83rd Regular

Texas House Bill HB1705 Introduced / Fiscal Note

Filed 02/01/2025

Download
.pdf .doc .html
                    LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD    Austin, Texas      FISCAL NOTE, 83RD LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION            April 28, 2013      TO: Honorable Tryon D. Lewis, Chair, House Committee on Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence      FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board     IN RE:HB1705 by Farrar (Relating to the age qualification and extended jurisdiction over one seeking a suit affecting parent child relationship order in family court for purposes of obtaining special immigrant juvenile status.), As Introduced    No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.  The bill would amend the Family Code as it relates to the eligibility for extended court jurisdiction for special immigrant juvenile status individuals. The bill would also amend the Human Resources Code to direct the Department of Family and Protective Services (DFPS) to develop rules regarding undetermined immigrant status cases. The bill also specifies that DFPS shall develop rules to direct caseworkers to stop seeking fee waivers for filing fees associated with legal permanent status applications.  The Office of Court Administration does not anticipate any significant fiscal impact to the court system resulting from the bill. DFPS reports a cost resulting from the bill's requirement that the agency direct its caseworkers in rule to stop seeking legal permanent status application fee waivers from the United States Citizenship and Immigration Service. However, based on the number of legal permanent status applications that DFPS reports filing, this analysis assumes that any resulting costs could be reasonably absorbed within existing agency resources and will not result in a significant fiscal impact to the agency. Local Government Impact No significant fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.    Source Agencies:212 Office of Court Administration, Texas Judicial Council, 530 Family and Protective Services, Department of   LBB Staff:  UP, CL, AM, VJC    

LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE, 83RD LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
April 28, 2013





  TO: Honorable Tryon D. Lewis, Chair, House Committee on Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence      FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board     IN RE:HB1705 by Farrar (Relating to the age qualification and extended jurisdiction over one seeking a suit affecting parent child relationship order in family court for purposes of obtaining special immigrant juvenile status.), As Introduced  

TO: Honorable Tryon D. Lewis, Chair, House Committee on Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence
FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE: HB1705 by Farrar (Relating to the age qualification and extended jurisdiction over one seeking a suit affecting parent child relationship order in family court for purposes of obtaining special immigrant juvenile status.), As Introduced

 Honorable Tryon D. Lewis, Chair, House Committee on Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence 

 Honorable Tryon D. Lewis, Chair, House Committee on Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence 

 Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board

 Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board

HB1705 by Farrar (Relating to the age qualification and extended jurisdiction over one seeking a suit affecting parent child relationship order in family court for purposes of obtaining special immigrant juvenile status.), As Introduced

HB1705 by Farrar (Relating to the age qualification and extended jurisdiction over one seeking a suit affecting parent child relationship order in family court for purposes of obtaining special immigrant juvenile status.), As Introduced



No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.



The bill would amend the Family Code as it relates to the eligibility for extended court jurisdiction for special immigrant juvenile status individuals. The bill would also amend the Human Resources Code to direct the Department of Family and Protective Services (DFPS) to develop rules regarding undetermined immigrant status cases. The bill also specifies that DFPS shall develop rules to direct caseworkers to stop seeking fee waivers for filing fees associated with legal permanent status applications.  The Office of Court Administration does not anticipate any significant fiscal impact to the court system resulting from the bill. DFPS reports a cost resulting from the bill's requirement that the agency direct its caseworkers in rule to stop seeking legal permanent status application fee waivers from the United States Citizenship and Immigration Service. However, based on the number of legal permanent status applications that DFPS reports filing, this analysis assumes that any resulting costs could be reasonably absorbed within existing agency resources and will not result in a significant fiscal impact to the agency.

The bill would amend the Family Code as it relates to the eligibility for extended court jurisdiction for special immigrant juvenile status individuals. The bill would also amend the Human Resources Code to direct the Department of Family and Protective Services (DFPS) to develop rules regarding undetermined immigrant status cases. The bill also specifies that DFPS shall develop rules to direct caseworkers to stop seeking fee waivers for filing fees associated with legal permanent status applications. 

The Office of Court Administration does not anticipate any significant fiscal impact to the court system resulting from the bill. DFPS reports a cost resulting from the bill's requirement that the agency direct its caseworkers in rule to stop seeking legal permanent status application fee waivers from the United States Citizenship and Immigration Service. However, based on the number of legal permanent status applications that DFPS reports filing, this analysis assumes that any resulting costs could be reasonably absorbed within existing agency resources and will not result in a significant fiscal impact to the agency.

Local Government Impact

No significant fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.

Source Agencies: 212 Office of Court Administration, Texas Judicial Council, 530 Family and Protective Services, Department of

212 Office of Court Administration, Texas Judicial Council, 530 Family and Protective Services, Department of

LBB Staff: UP, CL, AM, VJC

 UP, CL, AM, VJC