Texas House Bill HB2188

Texas 2013 - 83rd Regular

Caption

Relating to the requirements for elevators, escalators, and related equipment; providing penalties.

Impact

If enacted, HB2188 would amend the Health and Safety Code, explicitly laying out the requirements for elevator and escalator safety inspections and the penalties for non-compliance. It emphasizes the need for proper training and continuing education for elevator inspectors, thus ensuring that those who are responsible for inspecting and maintaining such machinery are qualified and knowledgeable. Additionally, the bill allows for emergency orders to be issued by the executive director in situations where immediate action is required to protect public health and safety, particularly when an imminent threat is identified during an inspection.

Summary

House Bill 2188 proposes significant revisions to the regulations governing the inspection, maintenance, and certification of elevators, escalators, and associated equipment in the state of Texas. At its core, the bill seeks to enhance public safety by enforcing stricter compliance with established safety codes such as those recommended by the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME). The bill introduces mandatory annual inspections of relevant equipment and includes clear definitions and responsibilities for building owners, contractors, and inspectors involved in the operation and oversight of these facilities.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding HB2188 appears to be supportive among safety advocates and engineering professionals who advocate for enhanced safety protocols to prevent accidents and injuries associated with elevator and escalator use. However, there are concerns from contractors and building owners regarding the potential increase in operational costs and regulatory burdens, which could stem from the need for more frequent inspections and compliance with updated training requirements for inspectors.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the proposed implementation of fees associated with inspections and the necessity for certification processes which some argue could lead to increased costs for property owners. Critics express that while the intention behind the bill is to improve safety, the financial impact on businesses and the feasibility of complying with new regulations poses significant challenges. The bill may be seen as overregulating an industry that is already governed by established safety standards, thus raising concerns about the balance between ensuring safety and maintaining reasonable operational expectations.