Texas 2013 83rd Regular

Texas House Bill HB2225 House Committee Report / Fiscal Note

Filed 02/01/2025

Download
.pdf .doc .html
                    LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD    Austin, Texas      FISCAL NOTE, 83RD LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION            April 26, 2013      TO: Honorable Larry Phillips, Chair, House Committee on Transportation      FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board     IN RE:HB2225 by McClendon (Relating to the operation of a motor vehicle in the vicinity of an unprotected road user; providing penalties.), Committee Report 1st House, Substituted    No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.  The bill would amend Chapter 545 of the Transportation Code to provide what constitutes an unprotected road user, and would specify requirements for an operator of a motor vehicle in regard to an unprotected road user. A violation of this section would be punishable by a fine of not less than $1 or more than $200; a misdemeanor offense punishable by a fine of not more than $500 if the violation results in property damage; or a Class B misdemeanor if the violation results in bodily injury. The bill would provide a defense to prosecution if the unprotected road user was acting in violation of the law at the time of the offense. A Class B misdemeanor is punishable by a fine of not more than $2,000, confinement in jail for a term not to exceed 180 days, or both.  According to the Department of Public Safety, no fiscal impact to the State is anticipated. Local Government Impact Costs associated with enforcement, prosecution and confinement could likely be absorbed within existing resources. Revenue gain from fines imposed and collected is not anticipated to have a significant fiscal implication.    Source Agencies:405 Department of Public Safety   LBB Staff:  UP, AG, TP    

LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE, 83RD LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
April 26, 2013





  TO: Honorable Larry Phillips, Chair, House Committee on Transportation      FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board     IN RE:HB2225 by McClendon (Relating to the operation of a motor vehicle in the vicinity of an unprotected road user; providing penalties.), Committee Report 1st House, Substituted  

TO: Honorable Larry Phillips, Chair, House Committee on Transportation
FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE: HB2225 by McClendon (Relating to the operation of a motor vehicle in the vicinity of an unprotected road user; providing penalties.), Committee Report 1st House, Substituted

 Honorable Larry Phillips, Chair, House Committee on Transportation 

 Honorable Larry Phillips, Chair, House Committee on Transportation 

 Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board

 Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board

HB2225 by McClendon (Relating to the operation of a motor vehicle in the vicinity of an unprotected road user; providing penalties.), Committee Report 1st House, Substituted

HB2225 by McClendon (Relating to the operation of a motor vehicle in the vicinity of an unprotected road user; providing penalties.), Committee Report 1st House, Substituted



No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.



The bill would amend Chapter 545 of the Transportation Code to provide what constitutes an unprotected road user, and would specify requirements for an operator of a motor vehicle in regard to an unprotected road user. A violation of this section would be punishable by a fine of not less than $1 or more than $200; a misdemeanor offense punishable by a fine of not more than $500 if the violation results in property damage; or a Class B misdemeanor if the violation results in bodily injury. The bill would provide a defense to prosecution if the unprotected road user was acting in violation of the law at the time of the offense. A Class B misdemeanor is punishable by a fine of not more than $2,000, confinement in jail for a term not to exceed 180 days, or both.  According to the Department of Public Safety, no fiscal impact to the State is anticipated.

Local Government Impact

Costs associated with enforcement, prosecution and confinement could likely be absorbed within existing resources. Revenue gain from fines imposed and collected is not anticipated to have a significant fiscal implication.

Source Agencies: 405 Department of Public Safety

405 Department of Public Safety

LBB Staff: UP, AG, TP

 UP, AG, TP