LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD Austin, Texas FISCAL NOTE, 83RD LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION March 20, 2013 TO: Honorable Ryan Guillen, Chair, House Committee On Culture, Recreation & Tourism FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE:HB2469 by Guillen (Relating to deer breeding in this state and to procedures regarding certain deer permits.), As Introduced Estimated Two-year Net Impact to General Revenue Related Funds for HB2469, As Introduced: a negative impact of ($92,182) through the biennium ending August 31, 2015. The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions of the bill.
LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE, 83RD LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
March 20, 2013
TO: Honorable Ryan Guillen, Chair, House Committee On Culture, Recreation & Tourism FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE:HB2469 by Guillen (Relating to deer breeding in this state and to procedures regarding certain deer permits.), As Introduced
TO: Honorable Ryan Guillen, Chair, House Committee On Culture, Recreation & Tourism
FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE: HB2469 by Guillen (Relating to deer breeding in this state and to procedures regarding certain deer permits.), As Introduced
Honorable Ryan Guillen, Chair, House Committee On Culture, Recreation & Tourism
Honorable Ryan Guillen, Chair, House Committee On Culture, Recreation & Tourism
Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board
Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board
HB2469 by Guillen (Relating to deer breeding in this state and to procedures regarding certain deer permits.), As Introduced
HB2469 by Guillen (Relating to deer breeding in this state and to procedures regarding certain deer permits.), As Introduced
Estimated Two-year Net Impact to General Revenue Related Funds for HB2469, As Introduced: a negative impact of ($92,182) through the biennium ending August 31, 2015. The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions of the bill.
Estimated Two-year Net Impact to General Revenue Related Funds for HB2469, As Introduced: a negative impact of ($92,182) through the biennium ending August 31, 2015.
The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions of the bill.
General Revenue-Related Funds, Five-Year Impact: Fiscal Year Probable Net Positive/(Negative) Impact to General Revenue Related Funds 2014 ($46,091) 2015 ($46,091) 2016 ($46,091) 2017 ($46,091) 2018 ($46,091)
2014 ($46,091)
2015 ($46,091)
2016 ($46,091)
2017 ($46,091)
2018 ($46,091)
All Funds, Five-Year Impact: Fiscal Year Probable Revenue Gain fromGeneral Revenue Fund1 Probable (Cost) fromGeneral Revenue Fund1 Change in Number of State Employees from FY 2013 2014 $69,137 ($115,228) 1.0 2015 $69,137 ($115,228) 1.0 2016 $69,137 ($115,228) 1.0 2017 $69,137 ($115,228) 1.0 2018 $69,137 ($115,228) 1.0
Fiscal Year Probable Revenue Gain fromGeneral Revenue Fund1 Probable (Cost) fromGeneral Revenue Fund1 Change in Number of State Employees from FY 2013 2014 $69,137 ($115,228) 1.0 2015 $69,137 ($115,228) 1.0 2016 $69,137 ($115,228) 1.0 2017 $69,137 ($115,228) 1.0 2018 $69,137 ($115,228) 1.0
2014 $69,137 ($115,228) 1.0
2015 $69,137 ($115,228) 1.0
2016 $69,137 ($115,228) 1.0
2017 $69,137 ($115,228) 1.0
2018 $69,137 ($115,228) 1.0
Fiscal Analysis
The bill would amend portions of the Parks and Wildlife Code relating to identification of breeder deer, the process to refuse to issue or renew certain deer permits, the duration of a deer permit, the process to notify a deer breeder if it is believed the breeder holds deer posing a disease risk, the destruction of deer covered by a deer breeder permit or deer management permit (white-tailed or mule), and the sale, transfer or transport of breeder deer. Under bill provisions, the Texas Animal Health Commission (TAHC) would be required to provide a veterinarian to assess the disease/health threat of certain breeder or managed deer, under certain conditions. The bill would provide that any state-implemented destruction of white tail deer held at a deer breeding facility, or white tail or mule deer held on acreage covered by a permit only be carried out after an epidemiological assessment by the TAHC and a subsequent destruction order by the TAHC Executive Director. A deer breeder permittee holding game necessitating an epidemiological assessment would be required to pay for all costs associated with the assessment and subsequent destruction, if any. The Texas Parks and Wildlife Department (TPWD) and TAHC would divide the payment to cover costs incurred. The bill would take effect on September 1, 2013.
The bill would amend portions of the Parks and Wildlife Code relating to identification of breeder deer, the process to refuse to issue or renew certain deer permits, the duration of a deer permit, the process to notify a deer breeder if it is believed the breeder holds deer posing a disease risk, the destruction of deer covered by a deer breeder permit or deer management permit (white-tailed or mule), and the sale, transfer or transport of breeder deer.
Under bill provisions, the Texas Animal Health Commission (TAHC) would be required to provide a veterinarian to assess the disease/health threat of certain breeder or managed deer, under certain conditions. The bill would provide that any state-implemented destruction of white tail deer held at a deer breeding facility, or white tail or mule deer held on acreage covered by a permit only be carried out after an epidemiological assessment by the TAHC and a subsequent destruction order by the TAHC Executive Director.
A deer breeder permittee holding game necessitating an epidemiological assessment would be required to pay for all costs associated with the assessment and subsequent destruction, if any. The Texas Parks and Wildlife Department (TPWD) and TAHC would divide the payment to cover costs incurred.
The bill would take effect on September 1, 2013.
Methodology
Under bill provisions, TAHC would need one additional veterinarian to conduct 15-20 epidemiological assessments and/or threat analyses per fiscal year. This workload is based upon historical averages of requests provided by TPWD to TAHC. Also, a TAHC agent would need to be present at any subsequent destruction of deer, if any. TAHC reports the total anticipated salary, benefits, travel, and incidental operating costs for the veterinarian position would be $115,228 per fiscal year. A portion of these expenses would be recovered from the deer permittees, as required under bill provisions, to be split between TPWD and TAHC. However, this analysis estimates the actual recovery will be at 60 percent of actual costs, based on historical information provided by TPWD to TAHC. TPWD indicates it would have minimal additional expenses under bill provisions for programming the departments deer breeder database, including costs for establishing three and five-year permits. Also, TPWD anticipates additional attorney expenses for representing the department in hearings on permit non-renewals or revocations at the State Office of Administrative Hearings and in subsequent appeals, if any, in a district court. However, this analysis assumes these costs can be reasonably absorbed within the departments existing resources.
Under bill provisions, TAHC would need one additional veterinarian to conduct 15-20 epidemiological assessments and/or threat analyses per fiscal year. This workload is based upon historical averages of requests provided by TPWD to TAHC. Also, a TAHC agent would need to be present at any subsequent destruction of deer, if any.
TAHC reports the total anticipated salary, benefits, travel, and incidental operating costs for the veterinarian position would be $115,228 per fiscal year. A portion of these expenses would be recovered from the deer permittees, as required under bill provisions, to be split between TPWD and TAHC. However, this analysis estimates the actual recovery will be at 60 percent of actual costs, based on historical information provided by TPWD to TAHC.
TPWD indicates it would have minimal additional expenses under bill provisions for programming the departments deer breeder database, including costs for establishing three and five-year permits. Also, TPWD anticipates additional attorney expenses for representing the department in hearings on permit non-renewals or revocations at the State Office of Administrative Hearings and in subsequent appeals, if any, in a district court. However, this analysis assumes these costs can be reasonably absorbed within the departments existing resources.
Local Government Impact
No fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.
Source Agencies: 554 Animal Health Commission, 802 Parks and Wildlife Department
554 Animal Health Commission, 802 Parks and Wildlife Department
LBB Staff: UP, KJo, ZS, TB, JP
UP, KJo, ZS, TB, JP