LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD Austin, Texas FISCAL NOTE, 83RD LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION April 29, 2013 TO: Honorable Harvey Hilderbran, Chair, House Committee on Ways & Means FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE:HB2497 by Workman (Relating to an exemption from ad valorem taxation of real property used to operate a child-care facility.), As Introduced Estimated Two-year Net Impact to General Revenue Related Funds for HB2497, As Introduced: a negative impact of ($4,401,000) through the biennium ending August 31, 2015. The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions of the bill.
LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE, 83RD LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
April 29, 2013
TO: Honorable Harvey Hilderbran, Chair, House Committee on Ways & Means FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE:HB2497 by Workman (Relating to an exemption from ad valorem taxation of real property used to operate a child-care facility.), As Introduced
TO: Honorable Harvey Hilderbran, Chair, House Committee on Ways & Means
FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE: HB2497 by Workman (Relating to an exemption from ad valorem taxation of real property used to operate a child-care facility.), As Introduced
Honorable Harvey Hilderbran, Chair, House Committee on Ways & Means
Honorable Harvey Hilderbran, Chair, House Committee on Ways & Means
Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board
Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board
HB2497 by Workman (Relating to an exemption from ad valorem taxation of real property used to operate a child-care facility.), As Introduced
HB2497 by Workman (Relating to an exemption from ad valorem taxation of real property used to operate a child-care facility.), As Introduced
Estimated Two-year Net Impact to General Revenue Related Funds for HB2497, As Introduced: a negative impact of ($4,401,000) through the biennium ending August 31, 2015. The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions of the bill.
Estimated Two-year Net Impact to General Revenue Related Funds for HB2497, As Introduced: a negative impact of ($4,401,000) through the biennium ending August 31, 2015.
The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions of the bill.
General Revenue-Related Funds, Five-Year Impact: Fiscal Year Probable Net Positive/(Negative) Impact to General Revenue Related Funds 2014 $0 2015 ($4,401,000) 2016 ($14,531,000) 2017 ($21,770,000) 2018 ($25,079,000)
2014 $0
2015 ($4,401,000)
2016 ($14,531,000)
2017 ($21,770,000)
2018 ($25,079,000)
All Funds, Five-Year Impact: Fiscal Year Probable Savings/(Cost) fromFoundation School Fund193 Probable Revenue Gain/(Loss) fromSchool Districts Probable Revenue Gain/(Loss) fromCounties Probable Revenue Gain/(Loss) fromCities 2014 $0 $0 $0 $0 2015 ($4,401,000) ($6,992,000) ($3,473,000) ($3,849,000) 2016 ($14,531,000) ($9,368,000) ($7,260,000) ($8,058,000) 2017 ($21,770,000) ($5,868,000) ($8,366,000) ($9,302,000) 2018 ($25,079,000) ($6,881,000) ($9,641,000) ($10,737,000) Fiscal Year Probable Revenue Gain/(Loss) fromOther Special Districts 2014 $0 2015 ($2,539,000) 2016 ($5,303,000) 2017 ($6,105,000) 2018 ($7,030,000)
Fiscal Year Probable Savings/(Cost) fromFoundation School Fund193 Probable Revenue Gain/(Loss) fromSchool Districts Probable Revenue Gain/(Loss) fromCounties Probable Revenue Gain/(Loss) fromCities 2014 $0 $0 $0 $0 2015 ($4,401,000) ($6,992,000) ($3,473,000) ($3,849,000) 2016 ($14,531,000) ($9,368,000) ($7,260,000) ($8,058,000) 2017 ($21,770,000) ($5,868,000) ($8,366,000) ($9,302,000) 2018 ($25,079,000) ($6,881,000) ($9,641,000) ($10,737,000)
2014 $0 $0 $0 $0
2015 ($4,401,000) ($6,992,000) ($3,473,000) ($3,849,000)
2016 ($14,531,000) ($9,368,000) ($7,260,000) ($8,058,000)
2017 ($21,770,000) ($5,868,000) ($8,366,000) ($9,302,000)
2018 ($25,079,000) ($6,881,000) ($9,641,000) ($10,737,000)
Fiscal Year Probable Revenue Gain/(Loss) fromOther Special Districts 2014 $0 2015 ($2,539,000) 2016 ($5,303,000) 2017 ($6,105,000) 2018 ($7,030,000)
2014 $0
2015 ($2,539,000)
2016 ($5,303,000)
2017 ($6,105,000)
2018 ($7,030,000)
Fiscal Analysis
This bill would amend Section 11 of the Tax Code related to property tax exemptions to add a new section that would grant a property tax exemption on the real property of a qualified child care facility. To qualify the property would be required to be used for providing developmental and educational services for attending children, the property must be reasonably necessary for the operation of the facility and the operating entity must be accredited. The use of the property for incidental non-child care functions would be permitted if those functions benefit the attending children, or the staff and faculty. The exemption would not apply to any portion of the property not used as a child care facility. The bill would make conforming changes in the Tax Code. The bill would be effective on January 1, 2014, contingent on a constitutional amendment.
Methodology
The bill's proposed exemption of the real property of qualified child care centers would create a cost to units of local government and to the state through the operation of the school finance formula. A listing of all child care facilities licensed in Texas (about 9,500) was obtained from the Department of Family and Protective Services. An average real property taxable value was derived from a sample of the child care facilities using appraisal district records. The average taxable value was multiplied by the number of eligible accredited child care facilities to estimate the property value that would be subject to exemption. The percentage of all licensed child care facilities that are currently accredited is only about 5.5 percent but this percentage would be expected to grow rapidly under the bill because of the resulting property tax advantage. About 58 percent of all licensed child care facilities in Texas are currently either exempt or are leased and do not add any cost to this estimate. The applicable projected tax rates were applied to estimate the levy loss to special districts, cities and counties, and to estimate the initial school district loss. Because of the operation of the hold harmless provisions of the Education Code, about 60 percent of the school district cost related to the compressed rate would be transferred to the state in the first year of a taxable property value loss and 100 percent in later years. Because lagged year property values are used in the enrichment formula, school districts lose enrichment funding (state savings) in the first year of a taxable property value reduction. In the second and successive years the enrichment cost and a portion of the school district debt (facilities) cost are transferred to the state through the relevant funding formulas. All costs were estimated over the five year projection period.
Local Government Impact
The fiscal implication to units of local government is reflected in the table above and is contingent upon passage of a constitutional amendment authorizing the exemption.
Source Agencies: 304 Comptroller of Public Accounts
304 Comptroller of Public Accounts
LBB Staff: UP, KK, SD, SJS
UP, KK, SD, SJS