Texas 2013 83rd Regular

Texas House Bill HB252 Introduced / Fiscal Note

Filed 02/01/2025

Download
.pdf .doc .html
                    LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD    Austin, Texas      FISCAL NOTE, 83RD LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION            March 1, 2013      TO: Honorable Allan Ritter, Chair, House Committee On Natural Resources      FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board     IN RE:HB252 by Larson (Relating to water shortage reporting by water utilities.), As Introduced    No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.  The bill would amend Chapter 13 of the Water Code to require a retail public utility to report projected water supplies on a form to be prescribed by the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ); and to notify TCEQ if the projected available water supply is less than 180 days. Current statutes do not require a retail public utility to report available water supply. TCEQ reported the provisions of the bill are not anticipated to have a significant fiscal impact on the agency and could be performed utilizing the agencys available resources. The Texas Water Development Board reported no fiscal impact on the agency is anticipated. Local Government Impact According to the analysis by TCEQ, there are an estimated 3,139 local governments that are retail public utilities that could incur costs associated with additional reporting requirements and a water supply assessment. Some of those costs may include the technical capability to calculate the available water supply or to hire a contractor to perform a water supply assessment. The cost to perform a water supply assessment could vary significantly depending on the types of water supply utilized and the costs to hire a hydrologist, engineer or geologist. Some retail public utilities, especially smaller entities, may not have resources for associated costs. The Texas Municipal League indicated the fiscal impact for reporting requirements would not be significant, unless the notice required information that the city does not currently access.    Source Agencies:580 Water Development Board, 582 Commission on Environmental Quality   LBB Staff:  UP, SZ, TP    

LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE, 83RD LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
March 1, 2013





  TO: Honorable Allan Ritter, Chair, House Committee On Natural Resources      FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board     IN RE:HB252 by Larson (Relating to water shortage reporting by water utilities.), As Introduced  

TO: Honorable Allan Ritter, Chair, House Committee On Natural Resources
FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE: HB252 by Larson (Relating to water shortage reporting by water utilities.), As Introduced

 Honorable Allan Ritter, Chair, House Committee On Natural Resources 

 Honorable Allan Ritter, Chair, House Committee On Natural Resources 

 Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board

 Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board

HB252 by Larson (Relating to water shortage reporting by water utilities.), As Introduced

HB252 by Larson (Relating to water shortage reporting by water utilities.), As Introduced



No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.



The bill would amend Chapter 13 of the Water Code to require a retail public utility to report projected water supplies on a form to be prescribed by the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ); and to notify TCEQ if the projected available water supply is less than 180 days. Current statutes do not require a retail public utility to report available water supply. TCEQ reported the provisions of the bill are not anticipated to have a significant fiscal impact on the agency and could be performed utilizing the agencys available resources. The Texas Water Development Board reported no fiscal impact on the agency is anticipated.

Local Government Impact

According to the analysis by TCEQ, there are an estimated 3,139 local governments that are retail public utilities that could incur costs associated with additional reporting requirements and a water supply assessment. Some of those costs may include the technical capability to calculate the available water supply or to hire a contractor to perform a water supply assessment. The cost to perform a water supply assessment could vary significantly depending on the types of water supply utilized and the costs to hire a hydrologist, engineer or geologist. Some retail public utilities, especially smaller entities, may not have resources for associated costs. The Texas Municipal League indicated the fiscal impact for reporting requirements would not be significant, unless the notice required information that the city does not currently access.

Source Agencies: 580 Water Development Board, 582 Commission on Environmental Quality

580 Water Development Board, 582 Commission on Environmental Quality

LBB Staff: UP, SZ, TP

 UP, SZ, TP