LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD Austin, Texas FISCAL NOTE, 83RD LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION May 15, 2013 TO: Honorable Joe Straus, Speaker of the House, House of Representatives FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE:HB252 by Larson (Relating to water shortage reporting by water utilities and providers of wholesale water service.), As Passed 2nd House No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated. The bill would amend Chapter 13 of the Water Code to require a retail public utility and each entity from which the utility is obtaining wholesale water service to report projected water supplies on a form prescribed by the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ); and to notify TCEQ if the projected available water supply is less than 180 days. Current statutes do not require a retail public utility to report available water supply. TCEQ would be required to adopt rules to implement the provisions of the bill. TCEQ reported the provisions of the bill are not anticipated to have a significant fiscal impact on the agency and could be performed utilizing the agency's available resources. The Texas Water Development Board reported no fiscal impact on the agency is anticipated. Local Government Impact According to the analysis by TCEQ, there are an estimated 3,139 local governments that are retail public utilities that could incur costs associated with additional reporting requirements and a water supply assessment. Some of those costs may include the technical capability to calculate the available water supply or to hire a contractor to perform a water supply assessment. The cost to perform a water supply assessment could vary significantly depending on the types of water supply utilized and the costs to hire a hydrologist, engineer or geologist. Some retail public utilities, especially smaller entities, may not have resources for associated costs. The Texas Municipal League indicated the fiscal impact for reporting requirements would not be significant, unless the notice required information that the city does not currently access. Source Agencies:580 Water Development Board, 582 Commission on Environmental Quality LBB Staff: UP, SD, PM, SZ, TP
LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE, 83RD LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
May 15, 2013
TO: Honorable Joe Straus, Speaker of the House, House of Representatives FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE:HB252 by Larson (Relating to water shortage reporting by water utilities and providers of wholesale water service.), As Passed 2nd House
TO: Honorable Joe Straus, Speaker of the House, House of Representatives
FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE: HB252 by Larson (Relating to water shortage reporting by water utilities and providers of wholesale water service.), As Passed 2nd House
Honorable Joe Straus, Speaker of the House, House of Representatives
Honorable Joe Straus, Speaker of the House, House of Representatives
Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board
Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board
HB252 by Larson (Relating to water shortage reporting by water utilities and providers of wholesale water service.), As Passed 2nd House
HB252 by Larson (Relating to water shortage reporting by water utilities and providers of wholesale water service.), As Passed 2nd House
No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.
No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.
The bill would amend Chapter 13 of the Water Code to require a retail public utility and each entity from which the utility is obtaining wholesale water service to report projected water supplies on a form prescribed by the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ); and to notify TCEQ if the projected available water supply is less than 180 days. Current statutes do not require a retail public utility to report available water supply. TCEQ would be required to adopt rules to implement the provisions of the bill. TCEQ reported the provisions of the bill are not anticipated to have a significant fiscal impact on the agency and could be performed utilizing the agency's available resources. The Texas Water Development Board reported no fiscal impact on the agency is anticipated.
Local Government Impact
According to the analysis by TCEQ, there are an estimated 3,139 local governments that are retail public utilities that could incur costs associated with additional reporting requirements and a water supply assessment. Some of those costs may include the technical capability to calculate the available water supply or to hire a contractor to perform a water supply assessment. The cost to perform a water supply assessment could vary significantly depending on the types of water supply utilized and the costs to hire a hydrologist, engineer or geologist. Some retail public utilities, especially smaller entities, may not have resources for associated costs. The Texas Municipal League indicated the fiscal impact for reporting requirements would not be significant, unless the notice required information that the city does not currently access.
Source Agencies: 580 Water Development Board, 582 Commission on Environmental Quality
580 Water Development Board, 582 Commission on Environmental Quality
LBB Staff: UP, SD, PM, SZ, TP
UP, SD, PM, SZ, TP