Texas House Bill HB2704

Texas 2013 - 83rd Regular

Caption

Relating to bids for construction contracts for certain conservation and reclamation districts.

Impact

One significant aspect of HB2704 is the introduction of electronic bids for construction contracts. The bill stipulates that a district can receive electronic bids provided the district's board establishes appropriate rules to ensure the security and confidentiality of these bids. This aims to modernize bidding processes, making them more efficient and accessible, particularly beneficial for districts operating under specific constraints. The change reflects an evolving approach towards digital solutions in public procurement that can streamline operations and enhance transparency.

Summary

House Bill 2704 addresses the processes surrounding bids for construction contracts specifically within conservation and reclamation districts in Texas. This bill introduces amendments to Section 49.273 of the Water Code, detailing the circumstances under which change orders can be approved by district boards. Change orders can be approved for adjustments in the quantity of work or materials needed during a project, enhancing the flexibility of local boards in managing contracts amidst unanticipated conditions. The bill allows an official to approve changes involving minor expenditures of up to $50,000 and limits the overall increase in original contract price by no more than 25 percent due to these change orders.

Conclusion

HB2704 signifies a notable shift in the procedural dynamics of construction contracting within Texas's conservation framework. By allowing for more flexibility in contract administration and embracing technological advancements like electronic bidding, the bill positions itself to promote efficiency. Nevertheless, the legislative discourse around its implementation will likely highlight the need for balanced regulatory frameworks that protect all participants in the bidding process.

Contention

While the bill primarily aims to enhance operational efficiency within conservation and reclamation districts, there may be concerns regarding the safeguarding of electronic bidding processes. Critics might argue that with electronic submissions, the risk of data breaches or mishandling of confidential information increases. Additionally, the reliance on technology must ensure that it does not exclude smaller contractors who might lack the means or expertise to navigate digital bidding systems effectively. Hence, while the bill is poised to foster modernization, it introduces challenges that stakeholders might need to address to ensure equitable access to public contracting.