Texas House Bill HB2713

Texas 2013 - 83rd Regular

Caption

Relating to making auxiliary and institutional funds of a state institution of higher education subject to legislative appropriation.

Impact

If enacted, HB 2713 would impact the financial operations of state higher education institutions by requiring them to deposit all cash receipts into the state treasury. This would include a variety of funding sources such as student fees, charges for services, and donations. The bill's provisions reflect a move towards greater accountability and transparency in the management of public funds, aligning state funding procedures with legislative oversight mechanisms. This could potentially lead to changes in how institutions allocate resources, as they will be accountable to state financial oversight bodies.

Summary

House Bill 2713 aims to amend the Education Code of Texas, specifically addressing the control and treatment of auxiliary and institutional funds in higher education. The bill proposes that these funds be subjected to legislative appropriation, which means that they would no longer be under the sole control of the governing boards of state institutions of higher education. This shift in control is significant, as it introduces a layer of state oversight over the financial aspects of higher education institutions that were previously managed independently by the institutions themselves.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 2713 appears to be mixed. Supporters argue that the bill is a necessary reform that will enhance accountability and ensure that public funds are utilized effectively in higher education settings. They believe that increased legislative appropriations will lead to better financial management practices. Conversely, detractors express concern that the bill may limit the operational autonomy of educational institutions by placing them under the scrutiny of state authorities. This could stifle individual institutions' ability to respond to their unique financial needs and challenges, thereby resulting in a one-size-fits-all approach to funding that may not be beneficial to all entities.

Contention

Notable points of contention around HB 2713 revolve around the balance between state oversight and institutional autonomy. While advocates see the necessity for legislative appropriation as a means to prevent misuse of funds and promote fiscal responsibility, critics warn that excessive control could hinder the ability of institutions to address local needs. The debate encapsulates a broader conversation about the role of state government in higher education funding and the potential ramifications for institutional flexibility and responsiveness to student demands.