Texas 2013 83rd Regular

Texas House Bill HB2740 Introduced / Fiscal Note

Filed 02/01/2025

Download
.pdf .doc .html
                    LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD    Austin, Texas      FISCAL NOTE, 83RD LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION            April 7, 2013      TO: Honorable Allan Ritter, Chair, House Committee on Natural Resources      FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board     IN RE:HB2740 by Martinez Fischer (Relating to the renewal or amendment of permits issued by groundwater conservation districts.), As Introduced    No fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.  The bill would amend Chapter 36 of the Water Code to specify procedures regarding renewal or permit amendments issued by a groundwater and conservation district. After notice and hearing conducted, a district could amend an operating permit to adjust the amount or rate of authorized withdrawals by not more than five percent, based on a finding and supported by evidence submitted by the general manager of the district that a significant change in aquifer conditions justifies the amendment. A district that amends an operating permit must similarly amend all operating permits that are affected by the change in aquifer conditions. Local Government Impact There could be fiscal impact to a district to hold a public hearing that would vary depending on current procedures and a district's budget. Costs to hold a public hearing are an estimated $12,000 which could be a significant portion of a district's current budget which may range from $25,000 to $100,000. In addition, while the five percent change to a permit would not result in increased costs, it could affect the amount of water that would be available.    Source Agencies:592 Soil and Water Conservation Board   LBB Staff:  UP, SZ, TP    

LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE, 83RD LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
April 7, 2013





  TO: Honorable Allan Ritter, Chair, House Committee on Natural Resources      FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board     IN RE:HB2740 by Martinez Fischer (Relating to the renewal or amendment of permits issued by groundwater conservation districts.), As Introduced  

TO: Honorable Allan Ritter, Chair, House Committee on Natural Resources
FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE: HB2740 by Martinez Fischer (Relating to the renewal or amendment of permits issued by groundwater conservation districts.), As Introduced

 Honorable Allan Ritter, Chair, House Committee on Natural Resources 

 Honorable Allan Ritter, Chair, House Committee on Natural Resources 

 Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board

 Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board

HB2740 by Martinez Fischer (Relating to the renewal or amendment of permits issued by groundwater conservation districts.), As Introduced

HB2740 by Martinez Fischer (Relating to the renewal or amendment of permits issued by groundwater conservation districts.), As Introduced



No fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

No fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.



The bill would amend Chapter 36 of the Water Code to specify procedures regarding renewal or permit amendments issued by a groundwater and conservation district. After notice and hearing conducted, a district could amend an operating permit to adjust the amount or rate of authorized withdrawals by not more than five percent, based on a finding and supported by evidence submitted by the general manager of the district that a significant change in aquifer conditions justifies the amendment. A district that amends an operating permit must similarly amend all operating permits that are affected by the change in aquifer conditions.

Local Government Impact

There could be fiscal impact to a district to hold a public hearing that would vary depending on current procedures and a district's budget. Costs to hold a public hearing are an estimated $12,000 which could be a significant portion of a district's current budget which may range from $25,000 to $100,000. In addition, while the five percent change to a permit would not result in increased costs, it could affect the amount of water that would be available.

Source Agencies: 592 Soil and Water Conservation Board

592 Soil and Water Conservation Board

LBB Staff: UP, SZ, TP

 UP, SZ, TP