Texas House Bill HB2800

Texas 2013 - 83rd Regular

Caption

Relating to funding for certain county transportation infrastructure projects.

Impact

The implementation of HB 2800 is expected to significantly impact transportation funding at the county level. By tying the fund's revenue to oil and gas well completions, counties that experience higher levels of production will receive funding proportional to their activity, thereby incentivizing local infrastructure improvements that correspond with regional economic dynamics. This policy aims to equip counties with necessary resources to develop their transportation systems responsibly, thus helping maintain safety and effectiveness on roads affected by heavy industrial traffic.

Summary

House Bill 2800 focuses on establishing a funding mechanism dedicated to transportation infrastructure projects within Texas counties. The bill proposes the creation of a transportation infrastructure fund, which would consist of a portion of the state's oil and gas production tax revenue. Specifically, if revenue exceeds historical levels from 1987, 25% of the excessive amount would be allocated to this fund. This legislative initiative addresses the need for improved infrastructure in regions impacted by oil and gas development, aiming to alleviate degradation caused by such activities.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 2800 appears generally positive, particularly among legislative supporters who see it as a crucial step towards enhancing infrastructure in oil-rich counties. However, there may be underlying concerns from environmental advocates who are wary of the bill's potential to promote further oil and gas development without adequate safety measures. This raises a dichotomy in perspectives where economic benefits through enhanced infrastructure compete against environmental sustainability and community health considerations.

Contention

Notable points of contention derive from the bill's dependence on oil and gas revenue, which could create volatility in funding availability tied to market fluctuations. Critics may argue that relying on fossil fuel revenues imposes an unsustainable model for infrastructure funding, especially in a context where alternative energy solutions are being pursued. Furthermore, concerns about prioritizing highway projects over other pressing community infrastructure needs may arise. The balance between economic growth and sustainable development remains a critical aspect of discussions surrounding this bill.