Texas House Bill HB2831

Texas 2013 - 83rd Regular

Caption

Relating to procedures for the house of representatives to convene and conduct business when the legislature is not in session; providing a penalty.

Impact

The implementation of HB 2831 would significantly affect how legislative business can be conducted in Texas. By enabling the House to convene for business independently of the Senate or Governor’s action, it increases the flexibility and responsiveness of the legislative process. This provision would empower the House to handle critical issues, such as potential removal of leadership, promptly without waiting for the standard legislative calendar.

Summary

House Bill 2831 introduces new procedures for the Texas House of Representatives to convene and conduct business during periods when the legislature is not in session. The bill, as outlined in the newly added Subchapter F to Chapter 301 of the Government Code, allows for the house to be convened by a proclamation from the speaker or by a majority of the members. This is particularly important for urgent matters that may need to be addressed outside of regular sessions.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 2831 appears to showcase the need for enhanced procedural strategies within the legislature. While supporters likely view the bill as a necessary adaptation to ensure that essential house business can be conducted timely, there could be valid concerns among some members about the concentration of power. The ability for the House to convene on short notice may raise discussions about potential risks of political maneuvering or lack of transparency.

Contention

A point of contention surrounding the bill lies in the provision that makes the names of members who sign a proclamation to convene confidential if the purpose is to consider the removal of the speaker. This aspect could raise concerns regarding accountability and transparency among legislators and the public, as it could shield the decision-making process from scrutiny. Additionally, the enforcement of penalties for violations of such confidentiality may generate further debate on the implications for legislative conduct and ethics.