Texas 2013 83rd Regular

Texas House Bill HB3093 Senate Committee Report / Bill

Filed 02/01/2025

Download
.pdf .doc .html
                    By: Elkins (Senate Sponsor - Zaffirini) H.B. No. 3093
 (In the Senate - Received from the House May 6, 2013;
 May 8, 2013, read first time and referred to Committee on
 Government Organization; May 16, 2013, reported adversely, with
 favorable Committee Substitute by the following vote:
 Yeas 6, Nays 0; May 16, 2013, sent to printer.)
 COMMITTEE SUBSTITUTE FOR H.B. No. 3093 By:  Zaffirini


 A BILL TO BE ENTITLED
 AN ACT
 relating to the powers and duties of the Department of Information
 Resources and the Legislative Budget Board regarding information
 resources technologies of state agencies.
 BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:
 SECTION 1.  Section 2054.051, Government Code, is amended by
 adding Subsection (h) to read as follows:
 (h)  The department shall:
 (1)  coordinate with the quality assurance team and
 Legislative Budget Board to develop contracting standards for
 information resources technologies acquisition and purchased
 services; and
 (2)  work with state agencies to ensure deployment of
 standardized contracts.
 SECTION 2.  Section 2054.055, Government Code, is amended by
 amending Subsection (b) and adding Subsection (b-2) to read as
 follows:
 (b)  The report must:
 (1)  assess the progress made toward meeting the goals
 and objectives of the state strategic plan for information
 resources management;
 (2)  describe major accomplishments of the state or a
 specific state agency in information resources management;
 (3)  describe major problems in information resources
 management confronting the state or a specific state agency;
 (4)  provide a summary of the total expenditures for
 information resources and information resources technologies by
 the state;
 (5)  make recommendations for improving the
 effectiveness and cost-efficiency of the state's use of information
 resources;
 (6)  describe the status, progress, benefits, and
 efficiency gains of the state electronic Internet portal project,
 including any significant issues regarding contract performance;
 (7)  provide a financial summary of the state
 electronic Internet portal project, including project costs and
 revenues;
 (8)  provide a summary of the amount and use of
 Internet-based training conducted by each state agency and
 institution of higher education;
 (9)  provide a summary of agency and statewide results
 in providing access to electronic and information resources to
 individuals with disabilities as required by Subchapter M; [and]
 (10)  assess the progress made toward accomplishing the
 goals of the plan for a state telecommunications network and
 developing a system of telecommunications services as provided by
 Subchapter H;
 (11)  identify proposed major information resources
 projects for the next state fiscal biennium, including project
 costs through stages of the project and across state fiscal years
 from project initiation to implementation;
 (12)  examine major information resources projects
 completed in the previous state fiscal biennium to determine the
 performance of the implementing state agency, cost and value
 effectiveness, timeliness, and other performance criteria
 necessary to assess the quality and value of the investment; and
 (13)  examine major information resources projects
 after the second anniversary of the project's completion to
 determine progress toward meeting performance goals and operating
 budget savings.
 (b-2)  The information required under Subsection (b)(11)
 must include:
 (1)  final total cost of ownership budget data for the
 entire life cycle of the major information resources project,
 including capital and operational costs that itemize staffing
 costs, contracted services, hardware purchased or leased, software
 purchased or leased, travel, and training;
 (2)  the original project schedule and the final actual
 project schedule;
 (3)  data on the progress toward meeting the original
 goals and performance measures of the project, specifically those
 related to operating budget savings;
 (4)  lessons learned on the project, performance
 evaluations of any vendors used in the project, and reasons for
 project delays or cost increases; and
 (5)  the benefits, cost avoidance, and cost savings
 generated by major technology resources projects.
 SECTION 3.  Subchapter C, Chapter 2054, Government Code, is
 amended by adding Sections 2054.065 and 2054.066 to read as
 follows:
 Sec. 2054.065.  IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PILOT PROGRAM. (a) In
 this section, "identity management" means the act of controlling
 information about computer users, including information that:
 (1)  authenticates the identity of a user;
 (2)  describes the user, the data the user is
 authorized to access, and the actions the user is authorized to
 perform; and
 (3)  specifies the individuals who and methods that are
 authorized to access and modify the data.
 (b)  The department, using available funds, with the
 cooperation of state agencies selected by the department, and in
 consultation with the Information Technology Council for Higher
 Education, shall develop and execute an identity management pilot
 program to address the delivery, support, maintenance, and
 operation of identity management technology.
 (c)  The pilot program shall assess:
 (1)  the costs of identity management to each state
 agency participating in the pilot program;
 (2)  the opportunities for other state agencies to use
 identity management policies and best practices identified by the
 department;
 (3)  the benefits to state agencies of identity
 management based on the results of the pilot program; and
 (4)  to the extent feasible, the use by state agencies
 of multifactor authentication, which may include systems that
 include digital signature and encryption.
 (d)  Not later than November 1, 2014, the department shall:
 (1)  prepare a report on the assessments made under
 Subsection (c) that identifies the short-term and long-term costs,
 risks, benefits, and other impacts to state agencies and this state
 of implementing identity management; and
 (2)  submit a copy of the report to the governor, the
 lieutenant governor, the speaker of the house of representatives,
 the standing committees of the legislature with jurisdiction over
 state agency technology and government organization, and the
 Legislative Budget Board.
 (e)  To implement the pilot program, the department may
 contract with one or more providers for identity management
 services.
 (f)  This section expires January 1, 2016.
 Sec. 2054.066.  DEPARTMENT REVIEW. (a) The department, in
 consultation with the quality assurance team, the Information
 Technology Council for Higher Education, and the Legislative Budget
 Board, shall review existing statutes, procedures, data, and
 organizational structures to identify opportunities to increase
 efficiency, customer service, and transparency in information
 resources technologies. The department must:
 (1)  identify and address financial data needed to
 comprehensively evaluate information resources technologies
 spending from an enterprise perspective;
 (2)  review best practices in information resources
 technologies governance, including private sector practices and
 lessons learned from other states; and
 (3)  review existing statutes regarding information
 resources technologies governance, standards, and financing to
 identify inconsistencies between current law and best practices.
 (b)  The department shall report its findings and
 recommendations to the governor, lieutenant governor, speaker of
 the house of representatives, Senate Government Organization
 Committee and House Technology Committee not later than December 1,
 2014.
 (c)  This section expires January 1, 2016.
 SECTION 4.  Section 2054.102, Government Code, is amended by
 adding Subsection (b-1) to read as follows:
 (b-1)  The Legislative Budget Board, in consultation with
 the department and the Information Technology Council for Higher
 Education, shall establish criteria to evaluate state agency
 biennial operating plans. In developing the criteria, the board
 shall include criteria on:
 (1)  the feasibility of proposed information resources
 projects for the biennium;
 (2)  the consistency of the plan with the state
 strategic plan;
 (3)  the appropriate provision of public electronic
 access to information;
 (4)  evidence of business process streamlining and
 gathering of business and technical requirements; and
 (5)  services, costs, and benefits.
 SECTION 5.  Subchapter E, Chapter 2054, Government Code, is
 amended by adding Section 2054.105 to read as follows:
 Sec. 2054.105.  ENTERPRISE-BASED STRATEGY. (a) The
 department, in consultation with the quality assurance team, the
 Information Technology Council for Higher Education, and the
 Legislative Budget Board, shall develop an enterprise-based
 strategy for information resources technologies in state
 government based on information resources technologies expenditure
 information collected from state agencies under this chapter.
 (b)  In developing the enterprise-based strategy for the
 state, the department must consider the following opportunities to
 achieve greater efficiency:
 (1)  developing personal computer replacement policies
 for the state, with consideration given to alternative models of
 personal computer use for state government, including thin client,
 software as a service, browser-based functionality, mobile
 computing, and other models that are less dependent on traditional
 computing;
 (2)  pursuing shared services initiatives across
 functional areas, including e-mail, telephony, and data storage;
 (3)  pursuing pilot programs, including a pilot program
 to demonstrate the value of application management services, to
 identify opportunities to achieve operational efficiencies;
 (4)  in consultation with the state auditor, the state
 archivist, the state records administrator, and the Texas State
 Library and Archives Commission, developing recommended policies
 for state agencies regarding data storage, record retention
 requirements and schedules, and the creation of a digital
 repository for permanently valuable electronic records of state
 government;
 (5)  reviewing existing software maintenance contracts
 to identify opportunities to renegotiate the price of those
 contracts or the level of service; and
 (6)  partnering with providers for commonly used
 information resources technologies.
 (c)  A department, commission, board, office, council,
 authority, or other agency of the legislative branch may coordinate
 with and participate in shared service initiatives, pilot programs,
 and the development of the enterprise-based strategy, where
 appropriate.
 (d)  The department, quality assurance team, and Legislative
 Budget Board shall work with state agencies to improve the
 acquisition and delivery of information resources technologies
 products and services.
 (e)  For the purposes of this subsection, enterprise-based
 strategy means a strategy to achieve efficiencies and cost savings
 that applies to two or more state agencies.
 SECTION 6.  This Act takes effect September 1, 2013.
 * * * * *