Texas 2013 83rd Regular

Texas House Bill HB3495 Introduced / Fiscal Note

Filed 02/01/2025

Download
.pdf .doc .html
                    LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD    Austin, Texas      FISCAL NOTE, 83RD LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION            April 15, 2013      TO: Honorable Jimmie Don Aycock, Chair, House Committee on Public Education      FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board     IN RE:HB3495 by Moody (Relating to educator financial incentives and salary contingencies based on student performance on certain assessment instruments.), As Introduced    No fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.  The bill would prohibit school districts from offering rewards, financial incentives, or salaries contingent on state-required assessment instruments. These provisions would not affect federal funding disbursed for a purpose otherwise prohibited by this subsection. Additionally, the bill would prohibit the use of student performance on state-required assessment instruments for making awards under the Educator Excellence Fund.  Based on the analysis of the Texas Education Agency (TEA), the bill has no direct fiscal implications for the FSP or the operations of the TEA. Local Government Impact School districts would not be able to provide or receive rewards, financial incentives, or make any portion of a teacher's salary contingent on student performance on state-required assessment instruments.     Source Agencies:701 Central Education Agency   LBB Staff:  UP, JBi, JSc    

LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE, 83RD LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
April 15, 2013





  TO: Honorable Jimmie Don Aycock, Chair, House Committee on Public Education      FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board     IN RE:HB3495 by Moody (Relating to educator financial incentives and salary contingencies based on student performance on certain assessment instruments.), As Introduced  

TO: Honorable Jimmie Don Aycock, Chair, House Committee on Public Education
FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE: HB3495 by Moody (Relating to educator financial incentives and salary contingencies based on student performance on certain assessment instruments.), As Introduced

 Honorable Jimmie Don Aycock, Chair, House Committee on Public Education 

 Honorable Jimmie Don Aycock, Chair, House Committee on Public Education 

 Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board

 Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board

HB3495 by Moody (Relating to educator financial incentives and salary contingencies based on student performance on certain assessment instruments.), As Introduced

HB3495 by Moody (Relating to educator financial incentives and salary contingencies based on student performance on certain assessment instruments.), As Introduced



No fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

No fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.



The bill would prohibit school districts from offering rewards, financial incentives, or salaries contingent on state-required assessment instruments. These provisions would not affect federal funding disbursed for a purpose otherwise prohibited by this subsection. Additionally, the bill would prohibit the use of student performance on state-required assessment instruments for making awards under the Educator Excellence Fund.  Based on the analysis of the Texas Education Agency (TEA), the bill has no direct fiscal implications for the FSP or the operations of the TEA.

The bill would prohibit school districts from offering rewards, financial incentives, or salaries contingent on state-required assessment instruments. These provisions would not affect federal funding disbursed for a purpose otherwise prohibited by this subsection. Additionally, the bill would prohibit the use of student performance on state-required assessment instruments for making awards under the Educator Excellence Fund.  Based on the analysis of the Texas Education Agency (TEA), the bill has no direct fiscal implications for the FSP or the operations of the TEA.

Local Government Impact

School districts would not be able to provide or receive rewards, financial incentives, or make any portion of a teacher's salary contingent on student performance on state-required assessment instruments. 

Source Agencies: 701 Central Education Agency

701 Central Education Agency

LBB Staff: UP, JBi, JSc

 UP, JBi, JSc