Texas 2013 83rd Regular

Texas House Bill HB3511 Introduced / Fiscal Note

Filed 02/01/2025

Download
.pdf .doc .html
                    LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD    Austin, Texas      FISCAL NOTE, 83RD LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION            April 13, 2013      TO: Honorable Allan Ritter, Chair, House Committee on Natural Resources      FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board     IN RE:HB3511 by Ritter (Relating to adjudication of claims under water contracts with local government entities.), As Introduced    No fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.  The bill would amend Chapter 271 of the Local Government Code to provide that remedies may include specific performance or injunctive relief or both for a written contract, including a right of first refusal, regarding the sale or delivery of not less than 1,000 acre-feet of reclaimed water intended for industrial use. The Texas Education Agency (TEA) indicated the bill would have no direct fiscal implications for the Foundation School Program or the operations of the TEA. The Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board indicated no fiscal impact is anticipated. Local Government Impact A local governmental entity could incur legal expenses if a written contract regarding the sale or delivery of reclaimed water for industrial use is adjudicated which could result in remedies for specific performance or injunctive relief or both; however, the amounts would vary depending on the terms and costs of the contract. TEA indicated that school districts are unlikely to enter into contracts for reclaimed water for industrial use; therefore, no direct fiscal impact is anticipated. The San Antonio River Authority (SARA) indicated that the provisions of the bill would not impact SARA. SARA operates several wastewater treatment plants that provide reclaimed water, but there is not enough to meet an industrial contract of 1000 acre-feet or more; SARA's reclaim contracts are currently not with industrial users and for less water than 1000 acre-feet and does not anticipate this changing in the foreseeable future based upon plant locations and the size of the communities that are served.    Source Agencies:592 Soil and Water Conservation Board, 701 Central Education Agency, 781 Higher Education Coordinating Board   LBB Staff:  UP, SZ, TP    

LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE, 83RD LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
April 13, 2013





  TO: Honorable Allan Ritter, Chair, House Committee on Natural Resources      FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board     IN RE:HB3511 by Ritter (Relating to adjudication of claims under water contracts with local government entities.), As Introduced  

TO: Honorable Allan Ritter, Chair, House Committee on Natural Resources
FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE: HB3511 by Ritter (Relating to adjudication of claims under water contracts with local government entities.), As Introduced

 Honorable Allan Ritter, Chair, House Committee on Natural Resources 

 Honorable Allan Ritter, Chair, House Committee on Natural Resources 

 Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board

 Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board

HB3511 by Ritter (Relating to adjudication of claims under water contracts with local government entities.), As Introduced

HB3511 by Ritter (Relating to adjudication of claims under water contracts with local government entities.), As Introduced



No fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

No fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.



The bill would amend Chapter 271 of the Local Government Code to provide that remedies may include specific performance or injunctive relief or both for a written contract, including a right of first refusal, regarding the sale or delivery of not less than 1,000 acre-feet of reclaimed water intended for industrial use. The Texas Education Agency (TEA) indicated the bill would have no direct fiscal implications for the Foundation School Program or the operations of the TEA. The Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board indicated no fiscal impact is anticipated.

Local Government Impact

A local governmental entity could incur legal expenses if a written contract regarding the sale or delivery of reclaimed water for industrial use is adjudicated which could result in remedies for specific performance or injunctive relief or both; however, the amounts would vary depending on the terms and costs of the contract. TEA indicated that school districts are unlikely to enter into contracts for reclaimed water for industrial use; therefore, no direct fiscal impact is anticipated. The San Antonio River Authority (SARA) indicated that the provisions of the bill would not impact SARA. SARA operates several wastewater treatment plants that provide reclaimed water, but there is not enough to meet an industrial contract of 1000 acre-feet or more; SARA's reclaim contracts are currently not with industrial users and for less water than 1000 acre-feet and does not anticipate this changing in the foreseeable future based upon plant locations and the size of the communities that are served.

A local governmental entity could incur legal expenses if a written contract regarding the sale or delivery of reclaimed water for industrial use is adjudicated which could result in remedies for specific performance or injunctive relief or both; however, the amounts would vary depending on the terms and costs of the contract.

TEA indicated that school districts are unlikely to enter into contracts for reclaimed water for industrial use; therefore, no direct fiscal impact is anticipated. The San Antonio River Authority (SARA) indicated that the provisions of the bill would not impact SARA. SARA operates several wastewater treatment plants that provide reclaimed water, but there is not enough to meet an industrial contract of 1000 acre-feet or more; SARA's reclaim contracts are currently not with industrial users and for less water than 1000 acre-feet and does not anticipate this changing in the foreseeable future based upon plant locations and the size of the communities that are served.

Source Agencies: 592 Soil and Water Conservation Board, 701 Central Education Agency, 781 Higher Education Coordinating Board

592 Soil and Water Conservation Board, 701 Central Education Agency, 781 Higher Education Coordinating Board

LBB Staff: UP, SZ, TP

 UP, SZ, TP