LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD Austin, Texas FISCAL NOTE, 83RD LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION May 23, 2013 TO: Honorable Joe Straus, Speaker of the House, House of Representatives FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE:HB3511 by Ritter (Relating to the adjudication of certain claims under a written contract with a special-purpose district or authority or local governmental entity. ), As Passed 2nd House No fiscal implication to the State is anticipated. The bill would add Chapter 113 to the Civil Practice and Remedies Code would establish requirements regarding the adjudication of certain claims under a written contract with a special-purpose district or authority or local governmental entity. The bill would define "adjudicating a claim" and "local district or authority." The chapter would not limit the authority of the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) or any other state regulatory agency as defined by the provisions of the bill. The bill would amend Chapter 271 of the Local Government Code to provide that remedies may include actual damages, specific performance or injunctive relief for a breach of a written contract, including a right of first refusal, regarding the sale or delivery of not less than 1,000 acre-feet of reclaimed water by a local governmental entity intended for industrial use. The Texas Education Agency (TEA) indicated the bill would have no direct fiscal implications for the Foundation School Program or the operations of the TEA. The Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board indicated no fiscal impact is anticipated. TCEQ indicated the provisions of the bill would not require any change in policy, procedure or rule; and no fiscal impact on the agency is anticipated. Local Government Impact A local governmental entity could incur legal expenses if a written contract regarding the sale or delivery of reclaimed water for industrial use is adjudicated which could result in remedies for actual damages, specific performance or injunctive relief; however, the amounts would vary depending on the terms and costs of the contract. TEA indicated that school districts are unlikely to enter into contracts for reclaimed water for industrial use; therefore, no direct fiscal impact is anticipated. The San Antonio River Authority (SARA) indicated that certain provisions of the bill would not impact SARA. SARA operates several wastewater treatment plants that provide reclaimed water, but there is not enough to meet an industrial contract of 1000 acre-feet or more; SARA's reclaim contracts are currently not with industrial users and for less water than 1000 acre-feet and does not anticipate this changing in the foreseeable future based upon plant locations and the size of the communities that are served. Source Agencies:582 Commission on Environmental Quality, 701 Central Education Agency, 781 Higher Education Coordinating Board, 592 Soil and Water Conservation Board LBB Staff: UP, SD, SZ, TP
LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE, 83RD LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
May 23, 2013
TO: Honorable Joe Straus, Speaker of the House, House of Representatives FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE:HB3511 by Ritter (Relating to the adjudication of certain claims under a written contract with a special-purpose district or authority or local governmental entity. ), As Passed 2nd House
TO: Honorable Joe Straus, Speaker of the House, House of Representatives
FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE: HB3511 by Ritter (Relating to the adjudication of certain claims under a written contract with a special-purpose district or authority or local governmental entity. ), As Passed 2nd House
Honorable Joe Straus, Speaker of the House, House of Representatives
Honorable Joe Straus, Speaker of the House, House of Representatives
Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board
Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board
HB3511 by Ritter (Relating to the adjudication of certain claims under a written contract with a special-purpose district or authority or local governmental entity. ), As Passed 2nd House
HB3511 by Ritter (Relating to the adjudication of certain claims under a written contract with a special-purpose district or authority or local governmental entity. ), As Passed 2nd House
No fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.
No fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.
The bill would add Chapter 113 to the Civil Practice and Remedies Code would establish requirements regarding the adjudication of certain claims under a written contract with a special-purpose district or authority or local governmental entity. The bill would define "adjudicating a claim" and "local district or authority." The chapter would not limit the authority of the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) or any other state regulatory agency as defined by the provisions of the bill. The bill would amend Chapter 271 of the Local Government Code to provide that remedies may include actual damages, specific performance or injunctive relief for a breach of a written contract, including a right of first refusal, regarding the sale or delivery of not less than 1,000 acre-feet of reclaimed water by a local governmental entity intended for industrial use. The Texas Education Agency (TEA) indicated the bill would have no direct fiscal implications for the Foundation School Program or the operations of the TEA. The Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board indicated no fiscal impact is anticipated. TCEQ indicated the provisions of the bill would not require any change in policy, procedure or rule; and no fiscal impact on the agency is anticipated.
Local Government Impact
A local governmental entity could incur legal expenses if a written contract regarding the sale or delivery of reclaimed water for industrial use is adjudicated which could result in remedies for actual damages, specific performance or injunctive relief; however, the amounts would vary depending on the terms and costs of the contract. TEA indicated that school districts are unlikely to enter into contracts for reclaimed water for industrial use; therefore, no direct fiscal impact is anticipated. The San Antonio River Authority (SARA) indicated that certain provisions of the bill would not impact SARA. SARA operates several wastewater treatment plants that provide reclaimed water, but there is not enough to meet an industrial contract of 1000 acre-feet or more; SARA's reclaim contracts are currently not with industrial users and for less water than 1000 acre-feet and does not anticipate this changing in the foreseeable future based upon plant locations and the size of the communities that are served.
Source Agencies: 582 Commission on Environmental Quality, 701 Central Education Agency, 781 Higher Education Coordinating Board, 592 Soil and Water Conservation Board
582 Commission on Environmental Quality, 701 Central Education Agency, 781 Higher Education Coordinating Board, 592 Soil and Water Conservation Board
LBB Staff: UP, SD, SZ, TP
UP, SD, SZ, TP