Texas House Bill HB3727

Texas 2013 - 83rd Regular

Caption

Relating to the fees collected by prosecutors for collection and processing of certain checks or similar sight orders; authorizing an increase in fees.

Impact

If passed, HB3727 will directly affect the Code of Criminal Procedure by modifying existing fee structures. The changes will likely increase the financial burden on those who need to process specific transactions involving checks or sight orders within the legal framework. By imposing higher fees, the bill could impact low-income individuals who might be dealing with financial hardships while navigating the criminal justice system. These amendments will come into effect for checks issued or passed on or after the effective date of the Act, ensuring a clear transition in how such fees are applied.

Summary

House Bill 3727 is aimed at adjusting the fees charged by prosecutors for the collection and processing of certain checks and similar sight orders. The bill proposes to increase the maximum allowable fees across various ranges of check amounts. For instance, it raises the maximum fee for a check exceeding $500 from $75 to $150 and sets higher caps for larger amounts. This amendment is likely intended to enhance the revenue generated from these processing fees, which can contribute to local and state funds supporting various criminal justice initiatives.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB3727 appears to be mixed. Proponents may argue that increasing fees could enhance the funding available for vital functions of the criminal justice system, supporting law enforcement and public safety programs. However, there are concerns regarding the practicality of additional fees in terms of their impact on individuals who may already struggle with the costs associated with criminal proceedings, raising questions about equity and access to justice.

Contention

Discussions around HB3727 could reflect contention particularly among various stakeholders. Critics may argue that increasing fees acts as a barrier for those seeking to comply with legal processes, especially for those from disadvantaged backgrounds. Furthermore, there may be debates on whether the revenue generated by such fees will adequately address the needs of the criminal justice system or merely add to the existing financial pressures faced by individuals at the receiving end of these changes.