Texas House Bill HB3885

Texas 2013 - 83rd Regular

Caption

Relating to powers of the North Harris County Regional Water Authority relating to certain wells.

Impact

The impact of HB 3885 on state laws primarily involves the regulatory authority the North Harris County Regional Water Authority has regarding groundwater management. The bill affirms and expands the existing rights and functions of the authority while validating previous governmental actions taken before the legislation’s effective date. As groundwater management becomes increasingly critical amidst environmental concerns, this bill is intended to enhance the authority’s ability to address such issues effectively.

Summary

House Bill 3885 is aimed at adjusting the powers of the North Harris County Regional Water Authority concerning certain wells. The bill introduces a provision that allows the authority to impose charges on specific wells that are no longer bound by groundwater reduction requirements starting from June 30, 2013. This adjustment is significant, as it grants the water authority more control over water management in the region, particularly as it relates to groundwater usage and conservation efforts.

Sentiment

General sentiment about the bill appears to be supportive among stakeholders focused on effective water management and conservation strategies. Proponents suggest that empowering the authority to charge for water resources helps ensure responsible usage and aids in the sustainability of groundwater. However, there may also be concerns regarding the implications of increased charges on local well owners and water users, which could lead to discussions about affordability and access.

Contention

Notably, points of contention may arise around the fairness of the imposed charges and the interpretation of 'groundwater reduction requirements.' Critics of such charges might argue that it disproportionately impacts well owners and could lead to inequitable access to water resources. Moreover, the validation of governmental acts could be disputed if previous actions are considered problematic or have faced legal challenges, potentially invoking issues regarding local governance autonomy.