Texas 2013 83rd Regular

Texas House Bill HB62 House Committee Report / Fiscal Note

Filed 02/01/2025

Download
.pdf .doc .html
                    LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD    Austin, Texas      FISCAL NOTE, 83RD LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION   Revision 1         April 7, 2013      TO: Honorable Tryon D. Lewis, Chair, House Committee on Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence      FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board     IN RE:HB62 by Guillen (Relating to a justice or judge having an interest in a business entity that owns, manages, or operates a private correctional or rehabilitation facility.), Committee Report 1st House, Substituted    No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.  The bill prohibits a justice or judge in state or county courts, but not municipal or justice courts, from having a substantial interest in a business entity that owns, manages or operates facilities which provide services to a person convicted of a misdemeanor, felony, or delinquent conduct. Judges who violate the provisions of the bill would violate the Code of Judicial Conduct. No significant fiscal impact to the state is anticipated. The bill would take effect January 1, 2015. Local Government Impact No significant fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.    Source Agencies:212 Office of Court Administration, Texas Judicial Council, 242 State Commission on Judicial Conduct   LBB Staff:  UP, CL, JP, SD, KKR    

LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE, 83RD LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
Revision 1
April 7, 2013

Revision 1

Revision 1

  TO: Honorable Tryon D. Lewis, Chair, House Committee on Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence      FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board     IN RE:HB62 by Guillen (Relating to a justice or judge having an interest in a business entity that owns, manages, or operates a private correctional or rehabilitation facility.), Committee Report 1st House, Substituted  

TO: Honorable Tryon D. Lewis, Chair, House Committee on Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence
FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE: HB62 by Guillen (Relating to a justice or judge having an interest in a business entity that owns, manages, or operates a private correctional or rehabilitation facility.), Committee Report 1st House, Substituted

 Honorable Tryon D. Lewis, Chair, House Committee on Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence 

 Honorable Tryon D. Lewis, Chair, House Committee on Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence 

 Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board

 Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board

HB62 by Guillen (Relating to a justice or judge having an interest in a business entity that owns, manages, or operates a private correctional or rehabilitation facility.), Committee Report 1st House, Substituted

HB62 by Guillen (Relating to a justice or judge having an interest in a business entity that owns, manages, or operates a private correctional or rehabilitation facility.), Committee Report 1st House, Substituted



No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.



The bill prohibits a justice or judge in state or county courts, but not municipal or justice courts, from having a substantial interest in a business entity that owns, manages or operates facilities which provide services to a person convicted of a misdemeanor, felony, or delinquent conduct. Judges who violate the provisions of the bill would violate the Code of Judicial Conduct. No significant fiscal impact to the state is anticipated. The bill would take effect January 1, 2015.

The bill prohibits a justice or judge in state or county courts, but not municipal or justice courts, from having a substantial interest in a business entity that owns, manages or operates facilities which provide services to a person convicted of a misdemeanor, felony, or delinquent conduct. Judges who violate the provisions of the bill would violate the Code of Judicial Conduct. No significant fiscal impact to the state is anticipated. 

Local Government Impact

No significant fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.

Source Agencies: 212 Office of Court Administration, Texas Judicial Council, 242 State Commission on Judicial Conduct

212 Office of Court Administration, Texas Judicial Council, 242 State Commission on Judicial Conduct

LBB Staff: UP, CL, JP, SD, KKR

 UP, CL, JP, SD, KKR