LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD Austin, Texas FISCAL NOTE, 83RD LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION March 1, 2013 TO: Honorable Joe Deshotel, Chair, House Committee On Land & Resource Management FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE:HB622 by Eiland (Relating to the report by the General Land Office to the legislature on the effectiveness of the coastal management program.), As Introduced No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated. The bill would change the requirement that the General Land Office prepare a report on the effectiveness of the coastal management program from an annual requirement to a biennial requirement. Although requiring one fewer report from the agency may result in some cost savings to the agency, the savings is not anticipated to be significant. Local Government Impact No significant fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated. Source Agencies:305 General Land Office and Veterans' Land Board LBB Staff: UP, SZ, ZS, TL
LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE, 83RD LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
March 1, 2013
TO: Honorable Joe Deshotel, Chair, House Committee On Land & Resource Management FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE:HB622 by Eiland (Relating to the report by the General Land Office to the legislature on the effectiveness of the coastal management program.), As Introduced
TO: Honorable Joe Deshotel, Chair, House Committee On Land & Resource Management
FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE: HB622 by Eiland (Relating to the report by the General Land Office to the legislature on the effectiveness of the coastal management program.), As Introduced
Honorable Joe Deshotel, Chair, House Committee On Land & Resource Management
Honorable Joe Deshotel, Chair, House Committee On Land & Resource Management
Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board
Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board
HB622 by Eiland (Relating to the report by the General Land Office to the legislature on the effectiveness of the coastal management program.), As Introduced
HB622 by Eiland (Relating to the report by the General Land Office to the legislature on the effectiveness of the coastal management program.), As Introduced
No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.
No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.
The bill would change the requirement that the General Land Office prepare a report on the effectiveness of the coastal management program from an annual requirement to a biennial requirement. Although requiring one fewer report from the agency may result in some cost savings to the agency, the savings is not anticipated to be significant.
Local Government Impact
No significant fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.
Source Agencies: 305 General Land Office and Veterans' Land Board
305 General Land Office and Veterans' Land Board
LBB Staff: UP, SZ, ZS, TL
UP, SZ, ZS, TL