Texas House Bill HB663

Texas 2013 - 83rd Regular

Caption

Relating to the expiration dates of concealed handgun licenses for certain members of the United States armed forces.

Impact

If enacted, HB 663 would create an exception to the existing regulations governing the renewal and expiration of concealed handgun licenses, specifically tailored for those serving in the armed forces. By permitting military members to retain their license validity during deployment, the bill acknowledges their service and commit to maintaining their rights. This change could have significant implications for the rights of service members, ensuring they are not penalized for their obligations to serve the country.

Summary

House Bill 663 proposes amendments to the Government Code regarding the expiration of concealed handgun licenses for certain members of the United States armed forces. The bill allows for the extension of handgun licenses for active-duty military personnel if their license is set to expire while they are deployed outside of the United States. Specifically, it states that the license will remain valid until the first birthday of the license holder after their return from deployment. This provision aims to address the unique circumstances faced by military members who may not be able to renew their licenses due to deployment.

Sentiment

The overall sentiment around HB 663 appears to be supportive, particularly among those advocating for military rights and the Second Amendment. Proponents of the bill argue that it is a necessary step to protect the rights of active-duty military personnel, allowing them to maintain their ability to carry firearms even when they cannot attend to the renewal of their licenses. Critics, if any, would likely focus on concerns over the implications of extending firearm licenses and public safety, although the specific discussions around dissenting opinions were not highlighted in the provided materials.

Contention

While there may not be overt contention highlighted in the documents, potential points of disagreement could arise around the balance between supporting military personnel and ensuring public safety concerning concealed carry laws. Questions may be raised regarding the implications for enforcement and monitoring of such extensions and how they might affect local regulations concerning firearms.