LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD Austin, Texas FISCAL NOTE, 83RD LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION April 22, 2013 TO: Honorable Jim Pitts, Chair, House Committee on Appropriations FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE:HJR65 by Creighton (Proposing a constitutional amendment regarding the limitation on the rate of growth of appropriations.), As Introduced No fiscal implication to the State is anticipated in the upcoming biennium, other than the cost of publication. The cost to the state for publication of the resolution is $108,921. This resolution proposes amendments to the Texas Constitution concerning the limitation on the rate of growth of certain appropriations. The proposed amendment to Section 22, Article VIII, if adopted, would limit the biennial growth of appropriations from state tax revenue not dedicated by the constitution to the sum of 1) the estimated rate of change in the state's population during the preceding state fiscal biennium, and 2) the estimated rate of monetary inflation or deflation in this state during the preceding state fiscal biennium. Currently, Article VIII, Section 22 of the Texas Constitution limits the biennial growth of appropriations from state tax revenue not dedicated by the constitution to the estimated rate of growth of the state's economy. Section 316.002 of the Government Code, instructs the Legislative Budget Board to determine the growth of the state's economy by estimating the growth in Texas personal income. The change from a limit applying the growth of personal income to one applying the sum of the estimated rate of increase in the state's population in the preceding biennium and the estimated rate of monetary inflation or deflation in this state during the preceding biennium would likely reduce the allowable growth rate in appropriations for subsequent biennia. For the purpose of illustration, the estimated rate of growth of personal income used to set the 2014-15 spending limit was 10.71 percent. The 2014-15 growth rate proposed by the resolution, based on population growth plus inflation growth during 2012-13, would be 6.82 percent based on population and inflation estimates in the Comptroller's Winter 2012-13 Economic Forecast. The proposed amendment only would apply to appropriations made for the 2016-17 biennium and subsequent biennia. The proposed constitutional amendment would be submitted to the voters at an election to be held November 4, 2014. Local Government Impact No fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated. Source Agencies:304 Comptroller of Public Accounts LBB Staff: UP, KK, SD, SJS
LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE, 83RD LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
April 22, 2013
TO: Honorable Jim Pitts, Chair, House Committee on Appropriations FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE:HJR65 by Creighton (Proposing a constitutional amendment regarding the limitation on the rate of growth of appropriations.), As Introduced
TO: Honorable Jim Pitts, Chair, House Committee on Appropriations
FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE: HJR65 by Creighton (Proposing a constitutional amendment regarding the limitation on the rate of growth of appropriations.), As Introduced
Honorable Jim Pitts, Chair, House Committee on Appropriations
Honorable Jim Pitts, Chair, House Committee on Appropriations
Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board
Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board
HJR65 by Creighton (Proposing a constitutional amendment regarding the limitation on the rate of growth of appropriations.), As Introduced
HJR65 by Creighton (Proposing a constitutional amendment regarding the limitation on the rate of growth of appropriations.), As Introduced
No fiscal implication to the State is anticipated in the upcoming biennium, other than the cost of publication. The cost to the state for publication of the resolution is $108,921.
No fiscal implication to the State is anticipated in the upcoming biennium, other than the cost of publication. The cost to the state for publication of the resolution is $108,921.
No fiscal implication to the State is anticipated in the upcoming biennium, other than the cost of publication.
The cost to the state for publication of the resolution is $108,921.
This resolution proposes amendments to the Texas Constitution concerning the limitation on the rate of growth of certain appropriations. The proposed amendment to Section 22, Article VIII, if adopted, would limit the biennial growth of appropriations from state tax revenue not dedicated by the constitution to the sum of 1) the estimated rate of change in the state's population during the preceding state fiscal biennium, and 2) the estimated rate of monetary inflation or deflation in this state during the preceding state fiscal biennium. Currently, Article VIII, Section 22 of the Texas Constitution limits the biennial growth of appropriations from state tax revenue not dedicated by the constitution to the estimated rate of growth of the state's economy. Section 316.002 of the Government Code, instructs the Legislative Budget Board to determine the growth of the state's economy by estimating the growth in Texas personal income. The change from a limit applying the growth of personal income to one applying the sum of the estimated rate of increase in the state's population in the preceding biennium and the estimated rate of monetary inflation or deflation in this state during the preceding biennium would likely reduce the allowable growth rate in appropriations for subsequent biennia. For the purpose of illustration, the estimated rate of growth of personal income used to set the 2014-15 spending limit was 10.71 percent. The 2014-15 growth rate proposed by the resolution, based on population growth plus inflation growth during 2012-13, would be 6.82 percent based on population and inflation estimates in the Comptroller's Winter 2012-13 Economic Forecast. The proposed amendment only would apply to appropriations made for the 2016-17 biennium and subsequent biennia. The proposed constitutional amendment would be submitted to the voters at an election to be held November 4, 2014.
Local Government Impact
No fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.
Source Agencies: 304 Comptroller of Public Accounts
304 Comptroller of Public Accounts
LBB Staff: UP, KK, SD, SJS
UP, KK, SD, SJS