Texas House Bill HJR99

Texas 2013 - 83rd Regular

Caption

Proposing a constitutional amendment providing for the issuance of general obligation bonds to finance pay-for-performance contracts for certain programs and services for health programs.

Impact

If passed, HJR99 would create a new funding structure that allows the Texas government to leverage debt to fund significant health-related programs. The establishment of a special fund by the comptroller for managing proceeds from the bond sales means that the funding would be restricted to health-related initiatives, which could lead to improved healthcare outcomes in the state. This change would directly influence how health services are funded, potentially leading to innovative approaches in service delivery driven by measurable performance metrics.

Summary

HJR99 proposes an amendment to the Texas Constitution that authorizes the legislature to issue general obligation bonds for financing pay-for-performance contracts aimed at various health programs and services. The bill specifically allows for bonds to be sold with a cap of $100 million, which would be used exclusively for health care, preventive services, and other health promotion initiatives. This funding mechanism is designed to enhance program delivery while ensuring that essential health services are adequately financed through performance-based contracts.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HJR99 is generally positive among health advocates who view the bill as a necessary step toward improving community health services in Texas. Supporters believe that such performance metrics will ensure accountability and efficiency in health service delivery. However, there may also be concerns regarding the long-term implications of incurring debt via bonds, particularly among fiscal conservatives who prioritize balanced budgets and minimal state borrowing.

Contention

Notable points of contention regarding HJR99 include debates over the efficacy of pay-for-performance contracts in the healthcare sector and the potential risks associated with the proposed bonding. Critics may argue that such funding mechanisms could incentivize superficial compliance with performance metrics that do not truly reflect the quality of care provided. Additionally, discussions may arise around how the proceeds from these bonds will be monitored and reported to ensure transparency and effectiveness in service implementation.