Texas Senate Bill SB1045

Texas 2013 - 83rd Regular

Caption

Relating to an evaluation of the state supported living center system.

Impact

The bill intends to shed light on the operations of state-supported living centers and their role in providing disability services. By evaluating operational efficiencies and community integration opportunities, the implementation of SB1045 could lead to significant changes in how support services are applied. This could ultimately influence policies relating to the allocation of resources for individuals with disabilities and shape future legislation aimed at improving community-based supports.

Summary

SB1045, titled 'Relating to an evaluation of the state supported living center system,' mandates an assessment of the state's supported living centers by an independent entity contracted by the Health and Human Services Commission and the Department of Aging and Disability Services. The evaluation will cover various factors, including proximity to community service providers, administrative costs, and marketability of the property. The findings aim to provide a comprehensive overview of the effectiveness and necessity of these centers amidst changing community services landscapes.

Sentiment

The sentiment around SB1045 appears to be generally supportive among advocates for individuals with disabilities, as the evaluation is seen as a beneficial step towards improving care and services. However, there may be concerns regarding potential outcomes of the evaluation, particularly fears that consolidation or closure of centers might occur as a result of the findings. As the bill moves forward, various stakeholders may express differing views based on their vested interests in local disability services.

Contention

Potential points of contention may arise around the interpretation of the evaluation findings and how they may impact the future of state-supported living centers. Stakeholders advocating for local control and personalized services may oppose any moves toward consolidation or reallocation of resources that could threaten the availability of specialized programs. The discussions around SB1045 indicate a need for careful consideration of both the benefits of enhancing community services and the risks of diminishing essential support structures.