Texas Senate Bill SB1091

Texas 2013 - 83rd Regular

Caption

Relating to a credit against the access fee for a private dock charged by the Brazos River Authority in the event of a drought.

Impact

The implementation of SB1091 is expected to have direct implications for private dock owners reliant on lake access for recreational and economic activities. By creating a financial remedy for lost access, the bill may alleviate some of the economic burdens that drought can impose on these individuals. The provision potentially encourages the responsible management of water resources and recognizes the economic implications of drought on local businesses and recreation.

Summary

SB1091 introduces a provision for a credit against the access fee charged for private docks by the Brazos River Authority in instances of drought. Specifically, the bill mandates that if a dock cannot provide access to the lake due to low water levels caused by drought for any part of the fee-charging year, the authority must credit the fee for the subsequent year. This credit is calculated based on the proportion of time the lake levels were insufficient for access in the previous year. Essentially, this legislation aims to provide financial relief to dock owners during drought conditions when their docks are rendered unusable.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB1091 appears to be supportive among stakeholders who are concerned about the affordability of maintaining private docks during drought conditions. Dock owners and related interest groups likely view the credit system as a step in the right direction. However, potential opposition may arise from those who argue about the sustainability of reducing fees and the financial implications for the Brazos River Authority, which may rely on those fees for operational funding.

Contention

Notable points of contention may arise from discussions regarding the long-term financial implications of the fee credits for the Brazos River Authority and its ability to maintain lake infrastructure. Additionally, there may be debates around how to effectively measure lake levels and the time frames relevant for calculating credits, ensuring fairness and transparency in fee adjustments. Stakeholders may also voice concerns about the management practices that could fixate on fee credits instead of addressing the underlying issues of drought and water availability.