LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD Austin, Texas FISCAL NOTE, 83RD LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION March 11, 2013 TO: Honorable Royce West, Chair, Senate Committee On Jurisprudence FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE:SB130 by Nelson (Relating to representation by prosecuting attorneys in proceedings for protective orders against family violence and in certain other actions.), As Introduced No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated. The bill would amend the Family Code to resolve potential legal representation conflict of interest issues relating to protective orders. The bill specifies that prosecuting attorneys in protective order cases are not precluded from previous, concurrent, or subsequent representation of a party in a protective order proceeding or representation of the Department of Family and Protective Services in another proceeding involving the party. The bill would take effect immediately if it received a vote of two-thirds of each house. Otherwise, the bill would take effect September 1, 2013. Local Government Impact No significant fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated. Source Agencies:212 Office of Court Administration, Texas Judicial Council, 530 Family and Protective Services, Department of LBB Staff: UP, CL, AM
LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE, 83RD LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
March 11, 2013
TO: Honorable Royce West, Chair, Senate Committee On Jurisprudence FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE:SB130 by Nelson (Relating to representation by prosecuting attorneys in proceedings for protective orders against family violence and in certain other actions.), As Introduced
TO: Honorable Royce West, Chair, Senate Committee On Jurisprudence
FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE: SB130 by Nelson (Relating to representation by prosecuting attorneys in proceedings for protective orders against family violence and in certain other actions.), As Introduced
Honorable Royce West, Chair, Senate Committee On Jurisprudence
Honorable Royce West, Chair, Senate Committee On Jurisprudence
Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board
Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board
SB130 by Nelson (Relating to representation by prosecuting attorneys in proceedings for protective orders against family violence and in certain other actions.), As Introduced
SB130 by Nelson (Relating to representation by prosecuting attorneys in proceedings for protective orders against family violence and in certain other actions.), As Introduced
No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.
No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.
The bill would amend the Family Code to resolve potential legal representation conflict of interest issues relating to protective orders. The bill specifies that prosecuting attorneys in protective order cases are not precluded from previous, concurrent, or subsequent representation of a party in a protective order proceeding or representation of the Department of Family and Protective Services in another proceeding involving the party. The bill would take effect immediately if it received a vote of two-thirds of each house. Otherwise, the bill would take effect September 1, 2013.
Local Government Impact
No significant fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.
Source Agencies: 212 Office of Court Administration, Texas Judicial Council, 530 Family and Protective Services, Department of
212 Office of Court Administration, Texas Judicial Council, 530 Family and Protective Services, Department of
LBB Staff: UP, CL, AM
UP, CL, AM