Texas Senate Bill SB1327

Texas 2013 - 83rd Regular

Caption

Relating to the reimbursement of utilities for relocation of utility facilities following improvement or construction of certain tolled highways.

Impact

The enactment of SB1327 would significantly change the legislative landscape governing utility relocations, making it mandatory for the department and the utilities to share the relocation costs equally. This shift is intended to provide clarity in the financial responsibilities tied to such projects and relieve some of the financial burdens currently placed on utility companies. The bill could encourage more responsive infrastructural developments while ensuring that utility operations remain unimpeded by construction activities.

Summary

SB1327 aims to regulate the reimbursement process for utilities required to relocate their facilities due to the construction or improvement of certain tolled highways. The bill amends specific sections of the Transportation Code related to cost-sharing governance between the state department and utilities involved in relocating utility infrastructure. It establishes a framework for equitably splitting the costs associated with these relocations, particularly when a nontolled highway is improved by adding toll lanes or is converted into a turnpike project.

Sentiment

The sentiment around SB1327 presents a mixture of optimism and caution. Supporters believe that the bill will streamlines processes that have long been contentious between utility companies and governmental authorities, fostering better planning and execution of vital infrastructure projects. Conversely, there are concerns among some stakeholders that the provisions might not adequately ensure timely relocation of utilities, potentially impacting service delivery, or that costs may still be burdensome for smaller utility firms.

Contention

Notable points of contention arise from the practical implications of the cost-sharing arrangement. Some critics argue that while the bill aims for equity, it may inadvertently lead to disputes over the interpretation of 'reasonable' costs and the legitimacy of expenses incurred during relocations. Additionally, the provisions set to take effect immediately upon receiving a two-thirds vote may provoke further debate concerning the urgency and necessity of such measures within the current legislative climate.