Texas Senate Bill SB1329

Texas 2013 - 83rd Regular

Caption

Relating to remedies for nonpayment of regional tollway authority tolls.

Impact

The bill has significant implications for state laws governing toll collection and enforcement. By centralizing the authority’s powers to penalize habitual violators, the bill effectively creates a more streamlined process for managing unpaid tolls. It also updates existing regulations to ensure that the consequences for failing to pay tolls can extend to the refusal to register a vehicle until debts are resolved. The measure aims to reduce revenue losses for toll authorities due to rampant nonpayment by increasing the pressure on violators to settle their accounts.

Summary

SB1329 is a legislative bill concerning remedies for nonpayment of tolls imposed by regional tollway authorities. The bill amends the Transportation Code to enhance the enforcement mechanisms available for collecting unpaid tolls. It introduces a procedure for the regional tollway authority to send multiple notices of nonpayment and allows the authority to seek an administrative decision for habitual violators—those who have incurred 100 or more unpaid tolls. Specific provisions require clear notification to the vehicle owner regarding claims and the consequences of nonpayment, including the potential refusal of vehicle registration.

Sentiment

Overall sentiment around SB1329 appears to be supportive from toll authorities and those in favor of stricter enforcement mechanisms. Proponents argue that it is necessary to ensure compliance with toll payments and thus maintain appropriate infrastructure funding. However, some criticisms arise regarding potential overreach and concerns about fairness in the treatment of habitual violators, particularly those who may inadvertently incur multiple tolls due to circumstances like vehicle theft or reporting delays. Therefore, while the bill aims to protect toll revenue, it raises discussions about the rights of vehicle owners.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the potential impact on individuals struggling with financial hardships who may find themselves disproportionately affected by tough enforcement measures. The inability to argue their case unless a hearing is requested within a certain time frame could lead to conflicting feelings about the bill's equitable nature. Additionally, the change allowing the refusal of vehicle registration adds a layer of consequence that some consider excessive, particularly if reasonable notice and the chance to contest nonpayment are not adequately provided.