Texas Senate Bill SB138

Texas 2013 - 83rd Regular

• Filed: 11/30/12

Caption

Relating to procedures for filing complaints with, and providing notice of certain violations to, the Texas Board of Professional Geoscientists.

Impact

This legislation will substantially modify the Texas Occupations Code by defining the responsibilities of state agencies in reporting potential violations. The bill mandates that if a state agency becomes aware of any infractions or irregularities concerning the Geoscientists Licensing Act, it must report these findings to the Board. The implications of this change are significant, as they enhance oversight and ensure that geoscientists are held to a higher standard of regulatory compliance. Additionally, this bill aims to reinforce public trust in the activities of licensed professionals by ensuring that complaints are diligently addressed.

Summary

SB138 concerns the procedures for filing complaints with the Texas Board of Professional Geoscientists. The bill seeks to outline clear protocols for the public to submit complaints against licensed geoscientists, aiming to enhance transparency and efficiency within the regulatory process. By establishing guidelines for the types of information needed and the manner of submission, the bill seeks to streamline complaint handling and response times. Furthermore, it emphasizes the importance of public education regarding these procedures in order to facilitate greater citizen engagement and accountability in the profession.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding SB138 include concerns about the potential implications for privacy and confidentiality, especially regarding the handling of sensitive information related to complaints. The bill affirms that any privileged information forwarded from state agencies to the Board will maintain its confidentiality, which has been a topic of debate among stakeholders. Critics argue that while confidentiality is necessary, there should still be robust mechanisms to ensure accountability and transparency in how complaints are resolved. The discussions reflect various interests, particularly between public protection advocates and professional geoscientists seeking to maintain trust and integrity within their field.