Texas Senate Bill SB1766

Texas 2013 - 83rd Regular

Caption

Relating to the criteria and requirements for the closure, consolidation, or consolidation plan of state supported living centers.

Impact

The passage of SB1766 is expected to significantly impact the management and oversight of state supported living centers. By instituting clear criteria for closure and consolidation, the bill seeks to enhance the efficiency of services while ensuring that residents receive the necessary support as facilities are either downsized or merged. Additionally, it requires the development of plans to mitigate adverse effects on local communities, ensuring job placement assistance and minimizing disruptions for impacted residents.

Summary

SB1766 aims to establish comprehensive criteria and requirements for the operation, closure, and consolidation of state supported living centers in Texas. The bill mandates the Department of Health and Human Services to develop objective criteria for assessing when a facility may need to be closed or consolidated. Specifically, it includes a formula-based approach considering factors such as changes in population, operating costs, costs per resident, and compliance with federal law. This structured approach addresses the needs for potential expansions or closures in a systematic and transparent manner.

Sentiment

The sentiment around SB1766 appears to be cautiously optimistic. Supporters emphasize the importance of having clear policies that guide the operation of these centers, especially in light of changing demographics and resource availability. However, there are underlying concerns among advocacy groups and community organizations regarding the implications of closures and consolidation, particularly how they could affect the quality of care and support provided to residents.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding SB1766 include the balance between operational efficiency and adequate care for individuals with disabilities. Critics argue that consolidation could lead to overcrowding in remaining facilities, potentially diminishing the quality of life for residents. Supporters counter that with proper planning and resources, the consolidation can be executed without disrupting the quality of care, thus ensuring that residents are still well-supported in their living arrangements.