Texas 2013 83rd Regular

Texas Senate Bill SB222 Introduced / Analysis

Filed 02/01/2025

Download
.pdf .doc .html
                    BILL ANALYSIS        Senate Research Center   S.B. 222     83R3648 MAW-D   By: Watson         Criminal Justice         3/7/2013         As Filed    

BILL ANALYSIS

 

 

Senate Research Center S.B. 222
83R3648 MAW-D By: Watson
 Criminal Justice
 3/7/2013
 As Filed

Senate Research Center

S.B. 222

83R3648 MAW-D

By: Watson

 

Criminal Justice

 

3/7/2013

 

As Filed

       AUTHOR'S / SPONSOR'S STATEMENT OF INTENT   Under current law, there is no provision for venue for prosecution of a computer crime in the jurisdiction where a victim resides if it is different from the offender.   This bill closes that venue loophole to better protect victims of online impersonation by authorizing prosecution in the jurisdiction where the victim resides if it is different from the offender.   Specifically, this bill amends Section 13.25 (Computer Crimes), Code of Criminal Procedure, by adding language to include "any county in which an individual who is a victim of the offense resides" to the venue options for the prosecution of computer crimes.   As proposed, S.B. 222 amends current law relating to the venue for prosecution of certain computer crimes.   RULEMAKING AUTHORITY   This bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, institution, or agency.   SECTION BY SECTION ANALYSIS   SECTION 1. Amends Article 13.25(b), Code of Criminal Procedure, to add to the locations where an offense under Chapter 33 (Computer Crimes), Penal Code, is authorized to be prosecuted, any county in which an individual who is a victim of the offense resides.   SECTION 2. Makes application of this Act prospective.   SECTION 3. Effective date: September 1, 2013. 

 

 

 

AUTHOR'S / SPONSOR'S STATEMENT OF INTENT

 

Under current law, there is no provision for venue for prosecution of a computer crime in the jurisdiction where a victim resides if it is different from the offender.

 

This bill closes that venue loophole to better protect victims of online impersonation by authorizing prosecution in the jurisdiction where the victim resides if it is different from the offender.

 

Specifically, this bill amends Section 13.25 (Computer Crimes), Code of Criminal Procedure, by adding language to include "any county in which an individual who is a victim of the offense resides" to the venue options for the prosecution of computer crimes.

 

As proposed, S.B. 222 amends current law relating to the venue for prosecution of certain computer crimes.

 

RULEMAKING AUTHORITY

 

This bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, institution, or agency.

 

SECTION BY SECTION ANALYSIS

 

SECTION 1. Amends Article 13.25(b), Code of Criminal Procedure, to add to the locations where an offense under Chapter 33 (Computer Crimes), Penal Code, is authorized to be prosecuted, any county in which an individual who is a victim of the offense resides.

 

SECTION 2. Makes application of this Act prospective.

 

SECTION 3. Effective date: September 1, 2013.