LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD Austin, Texas FISCAL NOTE, 83RD LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION March 1, 2013 TO: Honorable Dan Patrick, Chair, Senate Committee On Education FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE:SB317 by Uresti (Relating to the types of beverages that may be sold to students on public school campuses.), As Introduced No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated. The bill would prohibit school districts from selling beverages with added sweeteners, milk with more than one percent fat, juices less than 100 percent juice, caloric vitamin-enhanced water, or caloric electrolyte replacement beverages unless provided by the schools coach to students engaged in vigorous physical activity for at least one hour. The bill has no direct fiscal implications for the Foundation School Program (FSP) or the operations of the Texas Education Agency (TEA). The Texas Department of Agriculture (TDA) anticipates incurring approximately $23,354 in single-year, non-recurring costs related to rulemaking and to distributing updated Texas Public School Nutrition Policy materials to schools. Local Government Impact No significant fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated. There is a potential loss of revenue for some school districts that currently sell beverages that would be prohibited under the provisions of the bill. Source Agencies:551 Department of Agriculture, 701 Central Education Agency LBB Staff: UP, JBi, JSc, JP
LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE, 83RD LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
March 1, 2013
TO: Honorable Dan Patrick, Chair, Senate Committee On Education FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE:SB317 by Uresti (Relating to the types of beverages that may be sold to students on public school campuses.), As Introduced
TO: Honorable Dan Patrick, Chair, Senate Committee On Education
FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE: SB317 by Uresti (Relating to the types of beverages that may be sold to students on public school campuses.), As Introduced
Honorable Dan Patrick, Chair, Senate Committee On Education
Honorable Dan Patrick, Chair, Senate Committee On Education
Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board
Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board
SB317 by Uresti (Relating to the types of beverages that may be sold to students on public school campuses.), As Introduced
SB317 by Uresti (Relating to the types of beverages that may be sold to students on public school campuses.), As Introduced
No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.
No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.
The bill would prohibit school districts from selling beverages with added sweeteners, milk with more than one percent fat, juices less than 100 percent juice, caloric vitamin-enhanced water, or caloric electrolyte replacement beverages unless provided by the schools coach to students engaged in vigorous physical activity for at least one hour. The bill has no direct fiscal implications for the Foundation School Program (FSP) or the operations of the Texas Education Agency (TEA). The Texas Department of Agriculture (TDA) anticipates incurring approximately $23,354 in single-year, non-recurring costs related to rulemaking and to distributing updated Texas Public School Nutrition Policy materials to schools.
The bill would prohibit school districts from selling beverages with added sweeteners, milk with more than one percent fat, juices less than 100 percent juice, caloric vitamin-enhanced water, or caloric electrolyte replacement beverages unless provided by the schools coach to students engaged in vigorous physical activity for at least one hour.
The bill has no direct fiscal implications for the Foundation School Program (FSP) or the operations of the Texas Education Agency (TEA). The Texas Department of Agriculture (TDA) anticipates incurring approximately $23,354 in single-year, non-recurring costs related to rulemaking and to distributing updated Texas Public School Nutrition Policy materials to schools.
Local Government Impact
No significant fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated. There is a potential loss of revenue for some school districts that currently sell beverages that would be prohibited under the provisions of the bill.
Source Agencies: 551 Department of Agriculture, 701 Central Education Agency
551 Department of Agriculture, 701 Central Education Agency
LBB Staff: UP, JBi, JSc, JP
UP, JBi, JSc, JP