Texas 2013 83rd Regular

Texas Senate Bill SB358 Enrolled / Bill

Download
.pdf .doc .html
                    S.B. No. 358


 relating to the use of a polygraph statement as evidence that a
 defendant or releasee from the Texas Department of Criminal Justice
 has violated a condition of release.
 BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:
 SECTION 1.  Subsection (b), Section 5, Article 42.12, Code
 of Criminal Procedure, is amended to read as follows:
 (b)  On violation of a condition of community supervision
 imposed under Subsection (a) [of this section], the defendant may
 be arrested and detained as provided in Section 21 [of this
 article].  The defendant is entitled to a hearing limited to the
 determination by the court of whether it proceeds with an
 adjudication of guilt on the original charge.  The court may not
 proceed with an adjudication of guilt on the original charge if the
 court finds that the only evidence supporting the alleged violation
 of a condition of community supervision is the uncorroborated
 results of a polygraph examination.  The [This] determination to
 proceed with an adjudication of guilt on the original charge is
 reviewable in the same manner as a revocation hearing conducted
 under Section 21 [of this article] in a case in which an
 adjudication of guilt had not been deferred.  After an adjudication
 of guilt, all proceedings, including assessment of punishment,
 pronouncement of sentence, granting of community supervision, and
 defendant's appeal continue as if the adjudication of guilt had not
 been deferred.  A court assessing punishment after an adjudication
 of guilt of a defendant charged with a state jail felony may suspend
 the imposition of the sentence and place the defendant on community
 supervision or may order the sentence to be executed, regardless of
 whether the defendant has previously been convicted of a felony.
 SECTION 2.  Subsection (c), Section 21, Article 42.12, Code
 of Criminal Procedure, is amended to read as follows:
 (c)  The court may not revoke the community supervision of a
 defendant if, at the community supervision revocation hearing, the
 court finds that the only evidence supporting the alleged violation
 of a condition of community supervision is the uncorroborated
 results of a polygraph examination.  In a community supervision
 revocation hearing at which it is alleged only that the defendant
 violated the conditions of community supervision by failing to pay
 compensation paid to appointed counsel, community supervision
 fees, or court costs, the state must prove by a preponderance of the
 evidence that the defendant was able to pay and did not pay as
 ordered by the judge.  The court may order a community supervision
 and corrections department to obtain information pertaining to the
 factors listed under Article 42.037(h) [of this code] and include
 that information in the report required under Section 9(a) [of this
 article] or a separate report, as the court directs.
 SECTION 3.  Section 508.281, Government Code, is amended by
 adding Subsection (e) to read as follows:
 (e)  A parole panel or designated agent of the board may not
 revoke the parole or mandatory supervision of a releasee if the
 parole panel or designated agent finds that the only evidence
 supporting the alleged violation of a condition of release is the
 uncorroborated results of a polygraph examination.
 SECTION 4.  The change in law made by this Act applies to a
 hearing held under Section 5 or 21, Article 42.12, Code of Criminal
 Procedure, or Section 508.281, Government Code, on or after the
 effective date of this Act.
 SECTION 5.  This Act takes effect immediately if it receives
 a vote of two-thirds of all the members elected to each house, as
 provided by Section 39, Article III, Texas Constitution.  If this
 Act does not receive the vote necessary for immediate effect, this
 Act takes effect September 1, 2013.
 ______________________________ ______________________________
 President of the Senate Speaker of the House
 I hereby certify that S.B. No. 358 passed the Senate on
 March 27, 2013, by the following vote:  Yeas 30, Nays 0;
 May 22, 2013, Senate refused to concur in House amendments and
 requested appointment of Conference Committee; May 23, 2013, House
 granted request of the Senate; May 26, 2013, Senate adopted
 Conference Committee Report by the following vote:  Yeas 31,
 Nays 0.
 ______________________________
 Secretary of the Senate
 I hereby certify that S.B. No. 358 passed the House, with
 amendments, on May 17, 2013, by the following vote:  Yeas 112,
 Nays 27, two present not voting; May 23, 2013, House granted
 request of the Senate for appointment of Conference Committee;
 May 26, 2013, House adopted Conference Committee Report by the
 following vote:  Yeas 116, Nays 22, one present not voting.
 ______________________________
 Chief Clerk of the House
 Approved:
 ______________________________
 Date
 ______________________________
 Governor