Texas 2013 83rd Regular

Texas Senate Bill SB390 Engrossed / Fiscal Note

Filed 02/01/2025

Download
.pdf .doc .html
                    LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD    Austin, Texas      FISCAL NOTE, 83RD LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION            April 21, 2013      TO: Honorable Tryon D. Lewis, Chair, House Committee on Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence      FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board     IN RE:SB390 by West (Relating to the effective date of a new court cost or fee or of an amendment to the amount of a court cost or fee.), As Engrossed    No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.  The bill would amend the Government Code, Chapter 51 to repeal 51.607(d), which provides exemptions to a standard effective date for new or amended court costs. This change would make January 1 of the year following the effective date of bill the standard effective date for new or amended court costs. The Office of Court Administration (OCA) indicates it could absorb the costs associated with the bill within its current resources. The Comptroller of Public Accounts (CPA) does not anticipate a revenue gain to the state as a result of the bill. Local Government Impact CPA surveyed the counties of Dallas, Tom Green, and Angelina and the cities of Dallas, Pecos and Canyon with regards to the fiscal impact of the bill. All local governments surveyed except for the city of Dallas reported no anticipated fiscal impact. The city of Dallas expects a one-time technology cost of $10,000 to reprogram computers, but these costs would not have a significant impact on Dallas's budget.     Source Agencies:212 Office of Court Administration, Texas Judicial Council, 304 Comptroller of Public Accounts   LBB Staff:  UP, CL, ZS, JJO, KKR    

LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE, 83RD LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
April 21, 2013





  TO: Honorable Tryon D. Lewis, Chair, House Committee on Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence      FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board     IN RE:SB390 by West (Relating to the effective date of a new court cost or fee or of an amendment to the amount of a court cost or fee.), As Engrossed  

TO: Honorable Tryon D. Lewis, Chair, House Committee on Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence
FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE: SB390 by West (Relating to the effective date of a new court cost or fee or of an amendment to the amount of a court cost or fee.), As Engrossed

 Honorable Tryon D. Lewis, Chair, House Committee on Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence 

 Honorable Tryon D. Lewis, Chair, House Committee on Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence 

 Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board

 Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board

SB390 by West (Relating to the effective date of a new court cost or fee or of an amendment to the amount of a court cost or fee.), As Engrossed

SB390 by West (Relating to the effective date of a new court cost or fee or of an amendment to the amount of a court cost or fee.), As Engrossed



No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.



The bill would amend the Government Code, Chapter 51 to repeal 51.607(d), which provides exemptions to a standard effective date for new or amended court costs. This change would make January 1 of the year following the effective date of bill the standard effective date for new or amended court costs. The Office of Court Administration (OCA) indicates it could absorb the costs associated with the bill within its current resources. The Comptroller of Public Accounts (CPA) does not anticipate a revenue gain to the state as a result of the bill.

Local Government Impact

CPA surveyed the counties of Dallas, Tom Green, and Angelina and the cities of Dallas, Pecos and Canyon with regards to the fiscal impact of the bill. All local governments surveyed except for the city of Dallas reported no anticipated fiscal impact. The city of Dallas expects a one-time technology cost of $10,000 to reprogram computers, but these costs would not have a significant impact on Dallas's budget. 

Source Agencies: 212 Office of Court Administration, Texas Judicial Council, 304 Comptroller of Public Accounts

212 Office of Court Administration, Texas Judicial Council, 304 Comptroller of Public Accounts

LBB Staff: UP, CL, ZS, JJO, KKR

 UP, CL, ZS, JJO, KKR