LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD Austin, Texas FISCAL NOTE, 83RD LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION April 3, 2013 TO: Honorable Dan Patrick, Chair, Senate Committee on Education FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE:SB48 by Zaffirini (Relating to the transfer of a student from the school district of the student's residence to another district.), As Introduced No fiscal implication to the State is anticipated. The bill would permit the transfer of a student from the school district of the student's residence to another district at any time during a school year. The bill would allow the receiving district to revoke a student's transfer to the school district at any time during the school year under certain conditions. In such cases, the receiving school district would be required to provide due process, according to commissioner rule, before revoking the transfer. The bill would require the receiving school district to refund a pro rata amount for any prepaid tuition if the transfer approval was revoked. Based on the analysis of the Texas Education Agency (TEA), the bill has no direct fiscal implications for the Foundation School Program (FSP) or the operations of TEA. Local Government Impact No significant fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated. Source Agencies:701 Central Education Agency LBB Staff: UP, JBi, JSc
LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE, 83RD LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
April 3, 2013
TO: Honorable Dan Patrick, Chair, Senate Committee on Education FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE:SB48 by Zaffirini (Relating to the transfer of a student from the school district of the student's residence to another district.), As Introduced
TO: Honorable Dan Patrick, Chair, Senate Committee on Education
FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE: SB48 by Zaffirini (Relating to the transfer of a student from the school district of the student's residence to another district.), As Introduced
Honorable Dan Patrick, Chair, Senate Committee on Education
Honorable Dan Patrick, Chair, Senate Committee on Education
Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board
Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board
SB48 by Zaffirini (Relating to the transfer of a student from the school district of the student's residence to another district.), As Introduced
SB48 by Zaffirini (Relating to the transfer of a student from the school district of the student's residence to another district.), As Introduced
No fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.
No fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.
The bill would permit the transfer of a student from the school district of the student's residence to another district at any time during a school year. The bill would allow the receiving district to revoke a student's transfer to the school district at any time during the school year under certain conditions. In such cases, the receiving school district would be required to provide due process, according to commissioner rule, before revoking the transfer. The bill would require the receiving school district to refund a pro rata amount for any prepaid tuition if the transfer approval was revoked. Based on the analysis of the Texas Education Agency (TEA), the bill has no direct fiscal implications for the Foundation School Program (FSP) or the operations of TEA.
The bill would permit the transfer of a student from the school district of the student's residence to another district at any time during a school year. The bill would allow the receiving district to revoke a student's transfer to the school district at any time during the school year under certain conditions. In such cases, the receiving school district would be required to provide due process, according to commissioner rule, before revoking the transfer. The bill would require the receiving school district to refund a pro rata amount for any prepaid tuition if the transfer approval was revoked.
Based on the analysis of the Texas Education Agency (TEA), the bill has no direct fiscal implications for the Foundation School Program (FSP) or the operations of TEA.
Local Government Impact
No significant fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.
Source Agencies: 701 Central Education Agency
701 Central Education Agency
LBB Staff: UP, JBi, JSc
UP, JBi, JSc