Texas 2013 83rd Regular

Texas Senate Bill SB92 Introduced / Fiscal Note

Filed 02/01/2025

Download
.pdf .doc .html
                    LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD    Austin, Texas      FISCAL NOTE, 83RD LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION            March 1, 2013      TO: Honorable Royce West, Chair, Senate Committee On Jurisprudence      FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board     IN RE:SB92 by Van de Putte (Relating to the designation of a juvenile court and a pre-adjudication diversion program for certain juveniles alleged to have engaged in conduct that violates certain penal laws regarding prostitution.), As Introduced    No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.  The bill would amend sections of the Family Code relating to juvenile court designation and proceedings, and would authorize a juvenile board to establish a pre-adjudication diversion program for certain juveniles that violate penal laws regarding prostitution as a victim of human trafficking. The bill also specifies provisions for the diversion program and for cases to be directed to the program. According to the Office of Court Administration, no significant fiscal impact on the court system is anticipated. Local Government Impact There could be costs to a local governmental entity that chose to establish a diversion program. However, it is assumed that a juvenile board would establish a pre-adjudication diversion program only if sufficient funds were available or it would not result in a negative fiscal impact; therefore, no significant fiscal impact is anticipated.    Source Agencies:212 Office of Court Administration, Texas Judicial Council   LBB Staff:  UP, CL, TP    

LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE, 83RD LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
March 1, 2013





  TO: Honorable Royce West, Chair, Senate Committee On Jurisprudence      FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board     IN RE:SB92 by Van de Putte (Relating to the designation of a juvenile court and a pre-adjudication diversion program for certain juveniles alleged to have engaged in conduct that violates certain penal laws regarding prostitution.), As Introduced  

TO: Honorable Royce West, Chair, Senate Committee On Jurisprudence
FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE: SB92 by Van de Putte (Relating to the designation of a juvenile court and a pre-adjudication diversion program for certain juveniles alleged to have engaged in conduct that violates certain penal laws regarding prostitution.), As Introduced

 Honorable Royce West, Chair, Senate Committee On Jurisprudence 

 Honorable Royce West, Chair, Senate Committee On Jurisprudence 

 Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board

 Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board

SB92 by Van de Putte (Relating to the designation of a juvenile court and a pre-adjudication diversion program for certain juveniles alleged to have engaged in conduct that violates certain penal laws regarding prostitution.), As Introduced

SB92 by Van de Putte (Relating to the designation of a juvenile court and a pre-adjudication diversion program for certain juveniles alleged to have engaged in conduct that violates certain penal laws regarding prostitution.), As Introduced



No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.



The bill would amend sections of the Family Code relating to juvenile court designation and proceedings, and would authorize a juvenile board to establish a pre-adjudication diversion program for certain juveniles that violate penal laws regarding prostitution as a victim of human trafficking. The bill also specifies provisions for the diversion program and for cases to be directed to the program. According to the Office of Court Administration, no significant fiscal impact on the court system is anticipated.

Local Government Impact

There could be costs to a local governmental entity that chose to establish a diversion program. However, it is assumed that a juvenile board would establish a pre-adjudication diversion program only if sufficient funds were available or it would not result in a negative fiscal impact; therefore, no significant fiscal impact is anticipated.

Source Agencies: 212 Office of Court Administration, Texas Judicial Council

212 Office of Court Administration, Texas Judicial Council

LBB Staff: UP, CL, TP

 UP, CL, TP