Texas Senate Bill SB965

Texas 2013 - 83rd Regular

Caption

Relating to the correction of employment termination reports for law enforcement officers.

Impact

If enacted, SB 965 will have a significant impact on the way employment termination reports are handled within the law enforcement sector. The bill introduces processes that ensure officers have the opportunity to contest negative reports, aiming to enhance fairness and accountability. The amendment seeks to provide protection for law enforcement officers against erroneous or unfounded allegations that could tarnish their professional reputations. Additionally, the change in law applies only to petitions submitted after the bill becomes effective, ensuring a transition period for those previously filed under the former regulations.

Summary

Senate Bill 965 addresses the correction of employment termination reports for law enforcement officers in Texas. The bill amends the Occupations Code by establishing a framework for officers to contest and rectify information contained in these reports, particularly in cases where alleged misconduct has been reported. The language in the bill emphasizes the role of an administrative law judge, who is tasked with determining whether the alleged misconduct occurred based on a 'preponderance of the evidence.' If the evidence does not support the misconduct allegations, the judge can order that the report be amended and sent back to the original law enforcement agency.

Contention

The key point of contention surrounding SB 965 relates to the balance of accountability and fairness in the law enforcement community. Proponents argue that this bill is crucial for protecting officers against unjust termination reports that may arise without sufficient evidence, thus promoting a more just law enforcement culture. Critics may raise concerns about the potential for the bill to undermine the seriousness of reporting misconduct or the ability of law enforcement agencies to adequately respond to claims without compromising administrative processes. Overall, discussions may also touch on issues reflecting broader societal concerns regarding law enforcement transparency and integrity.