Texas Senate Bill SB978

Texas 2013 - 83rd Regular

Caption

Relating to regulation by the Texas Medical Board of local anesthesia and peripheral nerve blocks administered in an outpatient setting.

Impact

The impact of SB978 on state laws is significant as it modifies specific provisions within the Occupations Code that govern the medical practices associated with anesthesia usage. By defining conditions under which local anesthesia and peripheral nerve blocks can be administered without strict regulation, it aims to enhance operational flexibility for outpatient facilities. The bill states that these amendments only apply from the effective date onward, which will allow for a smooth transition for practices already operating under previous regulations. Medical facilities must now navigate less restrictive regulations, potentially leading to improved patient access to certain outpatient procedures.

Summary

Senate Bill 978 focuses on the regulation of local anesthesia and peripheral nerve blocks administered in outpatient settings by the Texas Medical Board. The primary aim of the bill is to provide guidelines and clarify the rules applicable to practices involving these types of anesthesia in various outpatient environments. Specifically, SB978 revises existing regulations that may have created barriers or ambiguity for medical practitioners in administering these forms of anesthesia safely and effectively. The bill implies a nuanced approach towards outpatient care, particularly for practices that utilize local anesthesia at dosages below certain thresholds.

Contention

During discussions around SB978, there were notable points of contention regarding the safety and efficacy of the changes proposed in the bill. Supporters argued that reducing regulatory burdens would enhance patient access to necessary procedures performed outside of traditional hospital settings. Conversely, critics were concerned about the potential for lowered safety standards and the implications this might have on patient outcomes if regulations are perceived to be too lenient. The need for a balanced approach to safety while promoting access was a key theme in the legislative debate surrounding this bill.