Texas Senate Bill SJR48

Texas 2013 - 83rd Regular

Caption

Proposing a constitutional amendment to require a member of the legislature to obtain and file a report on the costs and benefits of a bill or amendment to impose or increase an occupational regulation.

Impact

If enacted, SJR48 could significantly alter the process by which occupational regulations are introduced in Texas. By requiring a prior evaluation of the economic implications of such regulations, the bill intends to foster a more informed legislative environment, potentially leading to more prudent and impactful regulations. This amendment might also deter the introduction of regulations that do not have a justified economic rationale, thereby streamlining the legislative process concerning occupational licenses and regulations.

Summary

SJR48 proposes an amendment to the Texas Constitution that would mandate members of the legislature to obtain and file a report detailing the costs and benefits of any bill or amendment that seeks to impose or increase occupational regulations. This includes any requirement for individuals or entities to acquire licenses or other prerequisites necessary to practice a profession statewide. This legislative measure aims to enhance transparency and accountability in the regulation of professions by ensuring that comprehensive evaluations are conducted before new regulations are enacted.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SJR48 appears to be predominantly positive among proponents who view it as a necessary step toward increased accountability in government. Supporters argue that it will protect businesses and individuals from unnecessary or burdensome regulations by ensuring thorough analysis before regulatory changes are made. However, there might be concerns among those who fear that this could result in delays or inhibit necessary regulations that safeguard public interests, emphasizing the balance between regulation and economic implications.

Contention

Notable points of contention regarding SJR48 include debates over the effectiveness and efficiency of implementing a cost-benefit analysis for every occupational regulation. Critics may argue that such requirements could slow down legislative processes and hinder timely responses to emerging issues in various professions. Opponents may also express concerns about how these evaluations will be conducted and who decides the criteria, stressing the need for a careful approach to avoid undermining essential regulatory frameworks designed to protect public welfare.