Texas House Bill HB31

Texas 2013 - 83rd 2nd C.S.

Caption

Relating to the right of a county to intervene in an original rate proceeding.

Summary

House Bill 31 seeks to empower counties in Texas to intervene in original rate proceedings related to water and sewer utilities. Specifically, the bill allows a county to participate in proceedings if a utility seeks to increase rates by more than 25% for ratepayers in that county or if the utility serves over 3,000 ratepayers in the county. This legislative change intends to enhance the oversight of utility rate adjustments by local governments to protect the financial interests of residents, particularly in instances of significant rate hikes. The bill amends existing sections of the Water Code, which governs the procedures and regulations surrounding public utility ratemaking. By facilitating county involvement, the measure promotes greater transparency and accountability within the rate-setting process. Advocates contend that including counties in such decisions is essential for ensuring that the concerns of local ratepayers are adequately addressed and that any rate changes are fair and justified. Sentiment around HB 31 appears to be predominantly positive, with support coming from both legislators and residents concerned about recent trends in rising water rates. Many advocates argue that this bill represents a notable step towards empowering local governments to have a direct voice in matters that significantly impact their communities. However, there may also be opposition from utility companies that could see this bill as a hindrance to their operations or an additional burden to navigate local governmental procedures. Notable points of contention might arise concerning the balance of regulatory power between state and local governance. Some stakeholders might argue that increased county involvement could lead to complications or delays in the ratemaking process. Furthermore, there are concerns regarding the associated costs of implementing such interventions, as utilities could pass these costs back to consumers through rate adjustments. Therefore, the underlying dynamics of public utility regulation and local governance will be crucial as discussions around HB 31 continue.