LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD Austin, Texas FISCAL NOTE, 84TH LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION March 10, 2015 TO: Honorable Harold V. Dutton, Jr., Chair, House Committee on Juvenile Justice & Family Issues FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE:HB110 by White, James (Relating to the punishment by confinement for contempt of court for failure to obey a court order related to truancy.), As Introduced No fiscal implication to the State is anticipated. The bill would prohibit a court from punishing an individual found in contempt of court or who has engaged in delinquent conduct that would constitute contempt of court with confinement in jail or a juvenile detention facility.The Office of Court Administration does not anticipate a fiscal impact to the state court system. The Juvenile Justice Department does not anticipate a fiscal impact to the state. Local Government Impact There may be cost savings associated with prohibiting the use confinement as punishment in jail or a juvenile detention facility; however the reduction in costs are not anticipated to be significant. Source Agencies:212 Office of Court Administration, Texas Judicial Council, 644 Juvenile Justice Department, 701 Central Education Agency LBB Staff: UP, ESi, JJ, JQ, KVe, JPo, JBi, GDz
LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE, 84TH LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
March 10, 2015
TO: Honorable Harold V. Dutton, Jr., Chair, House Committee on Juvenile Justice & Family Issues FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE:HB110 by White, James (Relating to the punishment by confinement for contempt of court for failure to obey a court order related to truancy.), As Introduced
TO: Honorable Harold V. Dutton, Jr., Chair, House Committee on Juvenile Justice & Family Issues
FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE: HB110 by White, James (Relating to the punishment by confinement for contempt of court for failure to obey a court order related to truancy.), As Introduced
Honorable Harold V. Dutton, Jr., Chair, House Committee on Juvenile Justice & Family Issues
Honorable Harold V. Dutton, Jr., Chair, House Committee on Juvenile Justice & Family Issues
Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board
Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board
HB110 by White, James (Relating to the punishment by confinement for contempt of court for failure to obey a court order related to truancy.), As Introduced
HB110 by White, James (Relating to the punishment by confinement for contempt of court for failure to obey a court order related to truancy.), As Introduced
No fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.
No fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.
The bill would prohibit a court from punishing an individual found in contempt of court or who has engaged in delinquent conduct that would constitute contempt of court with confinement in jail or a juvenile detention facility.The Office of Court Administration does not anticipate a fiscal impact to the state court system. The Juvenile Justice Department does not anticipate a fiscal impact to the state.
Local Government Impact
There may be cost savings associated with prohibiting the use confinement as punishment in jail or a juvenile detention facility; however the reduction in costs are not anticipated to be significant.
Source Agencies: 212 Office of Court Administration, Texas Judicial Council, 644 Juvenile Justice Department, 701 Central Education Agency
212 Office of Court Administration, Texas Judicial Council, 644 Juvenile Justice Department, 701 Central Education Agency
LBB Staff: UP, ESi, JJ, JQ, KVe, JPo, JBi, GDz
UP, ESi, JJ, JQ, KVe, JPo, JBi, GDz