Texas 2015 84th Regular

Texas House Bill HB1122 Introduced / Fiscal Note

Filed 02/02/2025

Download
.pdf .doc .html
                    LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD    Austin, Texas      FISCAL NOTE, 84TH LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION            March 9, 2015      TO: Honorable John T. Smithee, Chair, House Committee on Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence      FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board     IN RE:HB1122 by Clardy (Relating to the number of jurors required in certain civil cases pending in a statutory county court.), As Introduced    No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.  The bill would amend the Government Code to provide that a jury would be composed of 12 members and the procedures regarding jury panels and selection of jurors would be the same as for district courts in that counties when the amount in controversy is $200,000 or more. Based on the analysis of the Office of Court Administration and Comptroller of Public Accounts, duties and responsibilities associated with implementing the provisions of the bill could be accomplished by utilizing existing resources. Local Government Impact The fiscal implications of the bill for local governments are indeterminate.  The Office of Court Administration assumes most statutory county courts' jurisdiction is capped at $200,000 and would not be impacted by the bill.  However, there may be some fiscal impact to counties related to additional juror pay that would vary depending on the number of civil jury trials where the amount in controversy exceeds $200,000 in counties where the statutory county courts' jurisdiction exceeds $200,000.  In addition, there is likely to be some fiscal impact to counties that would need to modify courtroom space to accommodate changes required by the bill since most statutory county courts have space for only 6-8 jurors.      Source Agencies:212 Office of Court Administration, Texas Judicial Council, 304 Comptroller of Public Accounts   LBB Staff:  UP, FR, MW, GDz    

LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE, 84TH LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
March 9, 2015





  TO: Honorable John T. Smithee, Chair, House Committee on Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence      FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board     IN RE:HB1122 by Clardy (Relating to the number of jurors required in certain civil cases pending in a statutory county court.), As Introduced  

TO: Honorable John T. Smithee, Chair, House Committee on Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence
FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE: HB1122 by Clardy (Relating to the number of jurors required in certain civil cases pending in a statutory county court.), As Introduced

 Honorable John T. Smithee, Chair, House Committee on Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence 

 Honorable John T. Smithee, Chair, House Committee on Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence 

 Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board

 Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board

HB1122 by Clardy (Relating to the number of jurors required in certain civil cases pending in a statutory county court.), As Introduced

HB1122 by Clardy (Relating to the number of jurors required in certain civil cases pending in a statutory county court.), As Introduced



No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.



The bill would amend the Government Code to provide that a jury would be composed of 12 members and the procedures regarding jury panels and selection of jurors would be the same as for district courts in that counties when the amount in controversy is $200,000 or more. Based on the analysis of the Office of Court Administration and Comptroller of Public Accounts, duties and responsibilities associated with implementing the provisions of the bill could be accomplished by utilizing existing resources.

Local Government Impact

The fiscal implications of the bill for local governments are indeterminate.  The Office of Court Administration assumes most statutory county courts' jurisdiction is capped at $200,000 and would not be impacted by the bill.  However, there may be some fiscal impact to counties related to additional juror pay that would vary depending on the number of civil jury trials where the amount in controversy exceeds $200,000 in counties where the statutory county courts' jurisdiction exceeds $200,000.  In addition, there is likely to be some fiscal impact to counties that would need to modify courtroom space to accommodate changes required by the bill since most statutory county courts have space for only 6-8 jurors.  

Source Agencies: 212 Office of Court Administration, Texas Judicial Council, 304 Comptroller of Public Accounts

212 Office of Court Administration, Texas Judicial Council, 304 Comptroller of Public Accounts

LBB Staff: UP, FR, MW, GDz

 UP, FR, MW, GDz