Texas 2015 84th Regular

Texas House Bill HB1264 Engrossed / Fiscal Note

Filed 02/02/2025

Download
.pdf .doc .html
                    LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD    Austin, Texas      FISCAL NOTE, 84TH LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION            May 12, 2015      TO: Honorable Kelly Hancock, Chair, Senate Committee on Administration      FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board     IN RE:HB1264 by Wu (Relating to the preservation of toxicological evidence collected in connection with certain intoxication offenses.), As Engrossed    No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.  The bill would amend the Code of Criminal Procedure to require any law enforcement agency or crime lab charged with collecting, analyzing, or storing the specimens to retain and preserve the evidence for certain periods of time, depending on certain specified circumstances.  A court would be required to determine the applicable retention period. It is assumed any costs associated with implementing the bill could be absorbed within current resources. Local Government Impact There would be costs to units of local governments for the costs to store and catalog toxicological evidence.  The costs and the fiscal impact will vary between entities depending on their overall budget, the number of cases, and the length of time storage is required for the evidence. According to the Office of Court Administration, some additional staff time would be required by local courts to produce the required notifications; however, no significant fiscal impact to local courts is anticipated.     Source Agencies:212 Office of Court Administration, Texas Judicial Council, 213 Office of the State Prosecuting Attorney, 405 Department of Public Safety, 407 Commission on Law Enforcement, 644 Juvenile Justice Department   LBB Staff:  UP, KK, KJo, AI, GDz, KVe, JAW    

LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE, 84TH LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
May 12, 2015





  TO: Honorable Kelly Hancock, Chair, Senate Committee on Administration      FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board     IN RE:HB1264 by Wu (Relating to the preservation of toxicological evidence collected in connection with certain intoxication offenses.), As Engrossed  

TO: Honorable Kelly Hancock, Chair, Senate Committee on Administration
FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE: HB1264 by Wu (Relating to the preservation of toxicological evidence collected in connection with certain intoxication offenses.), As Engrossed

 Honorable Kelly Hancock, Chair, Senate Committee on Administration 

 Honorable Kelly Hancock, Chair, Senate Committee on Administration 

 Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board

 Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board

HB1264 by Wu (Relating to the preservation of toxicological evidence collected in connection with certain intoxication offenses.), As Engrossed

HB1264 by Wu (Relating to the preservation of toxicological evidence collected in connection with certain intoxication offenses.), As Engrossed



No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.



The bill would amend the Code of Criminal Procedure to require any law enforcement agency or crime lab charged with collecting, analyzing, or storing the specimens to retain and preserve the evidence for certain periods of time, depending on certain specified circumstances.  A court would be required to determine the applicable retention period. It is assumed any costs associated with implementing the bill could be absorbed within current resources.

Local Government Impact

There would be costs to units of local governments for the costs to store and catalog toxicological evidence.  The costs and the fiscal impact will vary between entities depending on their overall budget, the number of cases, and the length of time storage is required for the evidence. According to the Office of Court Administration, some additional staff time would be required by local courts to produce the required notifications; however, no significant fiscal impact to local courts is anticipated. 

Source Agencies: 212 Office of Court Administration, Texas Judicial Council, 213 Office of the State Prosecuting Attorney, 405 Department of Public Safety, 407 Commission on Law Enforcement, 644 Juvenile Justice Department

212 Office of Court Administration, Texas Judicial Council, 213 Office of the State Prosecuting Attorney, 405 Department of Public Safety, 407 Commission on Law Enforcement, 644 Juvenile Justice Department

LBB Staff: UP, KK, KJo, AI, GDz, KVe, JAW

 UP, KK, KJo, AI, GDz, KVe, JAW