Texas House Bill HB1291

Texas 2015 - 84th Regular

Caption

Relating to the fees collected by prosecutors for collection and processing of certain checks or similar sight orders.

Impact

The modifications introduced by HB 1291 would significantly affect the Code of Criminal Procedure in Texas by ensuring that the fees charged by prosecutors for various checks are updated to a more equitable and financially accessible level. With the cap on the fees being increased from historically lower amounts, the bill is framed as a means to better compensate the collection efforts of state prosecutors, potentially affecting the budget allocations related to this area. The adjustments might help local jurisdictions cover the increased costs of processing, as they often bear these financial burdens.

Summary

House Bill 1291 proposes amendments relating to fees collected by prosecutors for the collection and processing of certain checks or similar sight orders. The bill aims to increase the cap on fees that prosecutors can charge for handling these financial instruments, updating the structure and amounts to reflect economic changes. The proposed changes adjust existing fee schedules, allowing for higher maximum charges based on the face value of the check or sight order, which varies in increments for different ranges of dollar amounts. This adjustment is intended to align fees with the costs associated with processing these orders in a contemporary context.

Contention

While supporters argue this bill reflects the current economic realities and necessitates a reassessment of the fee structures in place, there are concerns among critics that increasing fees might disproportionately impact individuals with limited financial resources. Notably, the balance of the proposal relies on the premise that it will enhance the efficacy of financial recoveries for the state. However, opponents highlight the risk of exacerbating financial hardships for low-income residents, who may already struggle with existing fees related to criminal procedures. The intended benefits may not yield the expected outcomes for equity in the justice system.