Texas 2015 84th Regular

Texas House Bill HB1329 House Committee Report / Analysis

Filed 02/02/2025

Download
.pdf .doc .html
                    BILL ANALYSIS             H.B. 1329     By: Naishtat     Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence     Committee Report (Unamended)             BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE    Generally speaking, a county that initiates mental health proceedings, whether by emergency detention or by filing an application for inpatient commitment, is responsible for any court costs. Interested parties are concerned that state law is ambiguous regarding who is responsible for costs when an entity other than the county initiates such a proceeding. H.B. 1329 seeks to clarify this matter.       CRIMINAL JUSTICE IMPACT   It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly create a criminal offense, increase the punishment for an existing criminal offense or category of offenses, or change the eligibility of a person for community supervision, parole, or mandatory supervision.       RULEMAKING AUTHORITY    It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution.       ANALYSIS    H.B. 1329 amends the Health and Safety Code to prohibit the county responsible for paying the costs of a hearing or proceeding under the Texas Mental Health Code from paying the costs from the additional filing fee collected in a statutory probate court to be used for court-related purposes for the support of the judiciary.       EFFECTIVE DATE    September 1, 2015.      

BILL ANALYSIS

# BILL ANALYSIS

 

 

 

H.B. 1329
By: Naishtat
Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence
Committee Report (Unamended)

H.B. 1329

By: Naishtat

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence

Committee Report (Unamended)

 

 

 

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE    Generally speaking, a county that initiates mental health proceedings, whether by emergency detention or by filing an application for inpatient commitment, is responsible for any court costs. Interested parties are concerned that state law is ambiguous regarding who is responsible for costs when an entity other than the county initiates such a proceeding. H.B. 1329 seeks to clarify this matter.
CRIMINAL JUSTICE IMPACT   It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly create a criminal offense, increase the punishment for an existing criminal offense or category of offenses, or change the eligibility of a person for community supervision, parole, or mandatory supervision.
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY    It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution.
ANALYSIS    H.B. 1329 amends the Health and Safety Code to prohibit the county responsible for paying the costs of a hearing or proceeding under the Texas Mental Health Code from paying the costs from the additional filing fee collected in a statutory probate court to be used for court-related purposes for the support of the judiciary.
EFFECTIVE DATE    September 1, 2015.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE 

 

Generally speaking, a county that initiates mental health proceedings, whether by emergency detention or by filing an application for inpatient commitment, is responsible for any court costs. Interested parties are concerned that state law is ambiguous regarding who is responsible for costs when an entity other than the county initiates such a proceeding. H.B. 1329 seeks to clarify this matter.

 

CRIMINAL JUSTICE IMPACT

 

It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly create a criminal offense, increase the punishment for an existing criminal offense or category of offenses, or change the eligibility of a person for community supervision, parole, or mandatory supervision.

 

RULEMAKING AUTHORITY 

 

It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution.

 

ANALYSIS 

 

H.B. 1329 amends the Health and Safety Code to prohibit the county responsible for paying the costs of a hearing or proceeding under the Texas Mental Health Code from paying the costs from the additional filing fee collected in a statutory probate court to be used for court-related purposes for the support of the judiciary.

 

EFFECTIVE DATE 

 

September 1, 2015.