Texas House Bill HB142

Texas 2015 - 84th Regular

• Filed: 11/10/14

Caption

Relating to the authority of the governing body of a local authority to impose a civil penalty for certain violations recorded by an automated traffic control system or a photographic traffic signal enforcement system.

Impact

If enacted, HB142 would modify current state transportation laws by amending various sections related to automated traffic control. This includes repealing outdated provisions that restricted local authorities from utilizing automated systems for traffic enforcement. While the bill directly facilitates local oversight in managing traffic law enforcement, it brings forth distinctions that clarify local government jurisdictions, thus potentially streamlining local traffic regulations and their enforcement through automated systems.

Summary

HB142 focuses on empowering local authorities with the ability to impose civil penalties for violations captured by automated traffic control systems or photographic traffic signal enforcement systems. The bill proposes significant adjustments to existing regulations governing the use of such systems, specifically within the jurisdiction of local municipalities. By defining automated traffic control systems more clearly, the bill seeks to establish uniform parameters under which localities can enforce traffic regulations, aiding in clarifying prior ambiguities in the law concerning automated enforcement mechanisms.

Contention

Despite its intentions to clarify and enhance local authority, HB142 has sparked a degree of contention among legislators. Supporters argue that granting local governments the power to enforce traffic regulations through automated systems will improve road safety and compliance. Conversely, detractors express concerns around potential over-reliance on technology for law enforcement, fearing that this may infringe upon individual rights and lead to unwarranted penalties without adequate human oversight. Balancing the benefits of enhanced local control with the need to protect citizens' rights emerges as a core debate surrounding the bill.