LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD Austin, Texas FISCAL NOTE, 84TH LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION May 22, 2015 TO: Honorable Joe Straus, Speaker of the House, House of Representatives FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE:HB1463 by Raymond (Relating to the procedure for canceling an exemption from ad valorem taxation of the residence homestead of an individual who is 65 years of age or older. ), As Passed 2nd House No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated. The bill would amend Section 11.43 of the Tax Code, regarding property tax exemption applications, to prohibit a chief appraiser from cancelling a previously allowed homestead exemption for an individual who is age 65 or older and who failed to file a new application as requested by the chief appraiser without first providing notice of the cancellation by certified mail. The notice would include a form for the individual to indicate whether they are qualified and a self-addressed postage prepaid envelope with instructions on returning the form to the chief appraiser. If the chief appraiser does not receive a response on or before the 60th day after the date the notice is mailed, the chief appraiser may cancel the exemption on or after the 30th day after the expiration of the 60-day period, but only after making a reasonable effort to locate the individual and determine whether the individual is qualified. A reasonable effort would be to send an additional cancellation notice immediately after the expiration of the 60-day period. The bill would require the additional notice to be sent by first class mail and meet other specified requirements. The chief appraiser would be permitted to provide the additional notice in another manner that the chief appraiser determines is appropriate. If a chief appraiser determines an individual no longer owns the property, these requirements do not apply to a cancelled homestead exemption from school district taxes for those who are age 65 or older under Tax Code Section 11.13(c) and these requirements do not apply to a cancelled optional homestead exemption adopted by a taxing unit for those who are age 65 or older under Tax Code Section 11.13(d).The number of homestead exemptions not cancelled or that have their cancellation delayed to another tax year is unknown. To the extent that the bill would delay, and in some cases stop the removal of a homestead exemption for an individual who is age 65 or older, the bill would create a cost to local taxing units and the state through the operation of the school funding formula. The cost would not be significant.The bill would take effect September 1, 2015. Local Government Impact No significant fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated. Source Agencies:304 Comptroller of Public Accounts LBB Staff: UP, KK, SD, SJS
LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE, 84TH LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
May 22, 2015
TO: Honorable Joe Straus, Speaker of the House, House of Representatives FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE:HB1463 by Raymond (Relating to the procedure for canceling an exemption from ad valorem taxation of the residence homestead of an individual who is 65 years of age or older. ), As Passed 2nd House
TO: Honorable Joe Straus, Speaker of the House, House of Representatives
FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE: HB1463 by Raymond (Relating to the procedure for canceling an exemption from ad valorem taxation of the residence homestead of an individual who is 65 years of age or older. ), As Passed 2nd House
Honorable Joe Straus, Speaker of the House, House of Representatives
Honorable Joe Straus, Speaker of the House, House of Representatives
Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board
Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board
HB1463 by Raymond (Relating to the procedure for canceling an exemption from ad valorem taxation of the residence homestead of an individual who is 65 years of age or older. ), As Passed 2nd House
HB1463 by Raymond (Relating to the procedure for canceling an exemption from ad valorem taxation of the residence homestead of an individual who is 65 years of age or older. ), As Passed 2nd House
No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.
No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.
The bill would amend Section 11.43 of the Tax Code, regarding property tax exemption applications, to prohibit a chief appraiser from cancelling a previously allowed homestead exemption for an individual who is age 65 or older and who failed to file a new application as requested by the chief appraiser without first providing notice of the cancellation by certified mail. The notice would include a form for the individual to indicate whether they are qualified and a self-addressed postage prepaid envelope with instructions on returning the form to the chief appraiser. If the chief appraiser does not receive a response on or before the 60th day after the date the notice is mailed, the chief appraiser may cancel the exemption on or after the 30th day after the expiration of the 60-day period, but only after making a reasonable effort to locate the individual and determine whether the individual is qualified. A reasonable effort would be to send an additional cancellation notice immediately after the expiration of the 60-day period. The bill would require the additional notice to be sent by first class mail and meet other specified requirements. The chief appraiser would be permitted to provide the additional notice in another manner that the chief appraiser determines is appropriate. If a chief appraiser determines an individual no longer owns the property, these requirements do not apply to a cancelled homestead exemption from school district taxes for those who are age 65 or older under Tax Code Section 11.13(c) and these requirements do not apply to a cancelled optional homestead exemption adopted by a taxing unit for those who are age 65 or older under Tax Code Section 11.13(d).The number of homestead exemptions not cancelled or that have their cancellation delayed to another tax year is unknown. To the extent that the bill would delay, and in some cases stop the removal of a homestead exemption for an individual who is age 65 or older, the bill would create a cost to local taxing units and the state through the operation of the school funding formula. The cost would not be significant.The bill would take effect September 1, 2015.
Local Government Impact
No significant fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.
Source Agencies: 304 Comptroller of Public Accounts
304 Comptroller of Public Accounts
LBB Staff: UP, KK, SD, SJS
UP, KK, SD, SJS